DSC-RX100M2
ƒ/1.8
10.4 mm
1/30
250

As an engineer in computer graphics , Tim realized that Vermeer’s walls express a gradient of color that is not visible by the human eye at a distance, but could be captured with a small 45°-tilted mirror near the focal plane of a camera obscura lens. He set out to reproduce a Vermeer with the lens and pigments of the period, and no painting ability. As he painted the parallel lines, he fond a subtle barrel distortion characteristic of a lens, and a photographic quality to his work, before the era of photography. Trailer

2 responses to “Tim’s Vermeer @EG showing that a mechanistic technique, not painting talent, is likely to be the secret of Vermeer”

  1. Detail in the rug DSC00838 An inspection on stage IMG_3070and interviewed by master art forger Ken Perenyi IMG_3075 where we learn that both of Vermeer’s parents were caught as fraudsters.

    And now, a nice summary of the technique in BoingBoing

  2. The rug sold me further on this idea. It screamed out "technology demo," a proof of something that this exclusive technique could do that competing painters couldn’t.

    It reminded me of so many briefings in which I was shown a rendered or captured image. It’s a beautiful synthetic image of a woman’s face, but the purpose is to point out that this GPU can render layers of skin with different levels of translucency, all in realtime etc.

    I find it so easy to imagine the original Vermeer hanging on a consumer’s wall, and people gawking at it the same way that people gawk at the first 4K display they’ve ever seen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *