Canon EOS 5D Mark II
ƒ/7.1
100 mm
1/3,200
500

55 lbs. Two flight computers. RF tracking beacon. Nomex honeycomb wings. Packed with the equivalent propellant of 4,000 Estes A engines.

The last time I flew this configuration, WIRED described it as “a black rocket 7 1/2 feet long that looks like a scaled-down cross between a ’60s-vintage X-15 rocket plane and a surface-to-air missile.”

I had five cameras running, with one strapped on the side of the rocket itself (it barely survived).
Here is the compilation video (or HD version).

21 responses to “My Sweet Sledgehammer – Ground Camera Images”

  1. climbing…
    IMG_0765

    bathing us with a deep subwoofer roar
    IMG_0767

  2. And a series of frame grabs from the video, these from Pad Cam One:
    Screen Shot 2012-02-08 at 10.15.20 PM

    Screen Shot 2012-02-08 at 10.15.50 PM

    Screen Shot 2012-02-08 at 10.16.19 PM

    Rock! (no humans near this camera =)

    This was lucky flight #7 for this airframe, with no damage along the way.
    Here are photos of the prior flights.

  3. Congrats. Excellent launch and video. Love that burn time.

  4. Great shots! cool, cool, cool! I get excited when I launch a cheap walmart rocket, I could not imagine the thrill of seeing something of this magnitude go off.

  5. Did somebody already say "Awesome"? Oh well. Awesome 🙂

  6. This seems an excellent, if original, tool for father and son bonding… How did you settle on such a whoooooooooooooooooosh-BANG hobby?

  7. It started with a visit to the hobby shop when my son was three, and we saw the nearly ready to fly Estes kits on the wall… and then, well, here’s a 3 minute talk I gave at TED on the early days…

  8. That thing looks menacing. In a good way of course.

  9. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] Looks interesting and educational too, but it also looks like people could get killed doing this. I remember a kid in my school, blew his hand off with one the early pencil rockets. The picture of the rocket in somebody’s windshield got me thinking on these lines. What struck me most, living in Europe, was the US government allowing private citizens to launch rockets 100s of thousands of feet into the sky. Wouldn’t it be possible to knock down a plane like that?

  10. For launches that could go high enough, the FAA’s permission is needed in advance to clear the airspace. As was done for this launch event. In Nevada, they routinely get permission to launch to 100K ft.

    There have been over 500 million rocket launches in the U.S. so far. Nobody has died. You can’t say that about about many perceived-to-be-safe activities, like golf, where people die golfing every year in Florida alone.

    Perhaps it is because of an appreciation for danger that people are more careful than they otherwise would be.

  11. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] That was Buck Fuller’s take on safety, he said if measured in miles traveled by accidents, the safest way to travel was with NASA to the moon. My grandfather was run over and killed by a drunken teenager, while crossing the street, which Bucky said is the most dangerous way to travel.

  12. Superfreakonomics makes some similar points – that drunk walking is more lethal than drunk driving and that swimming pools are more lethal than handguns at home.

  13. Gearing up for the first hamster in space?

  14. Well Hamster’s have to get into space sooner or later. Nice shot dude.

  15. heh, my rocket buddy Erik’s daughters have hamsters… and well, this reminds me of the fate of the girl’s precious Hoppy, turned cosmonaut

  16. ouch, i have just went through this exercise last year, if they have a male and female – babies can come every month, 11 at a time and mom can eat half if not stopped on time… did not know any of this… so the best way to keep hamsters is to keep one hamster in a cage separately from others, so they do not eat each other!

  17. It wasn’t my payload, and the conversation was not intended to alarm. That’s why the misinterpretation cracked us up.

    In any case, the national association of rocketry has a rule on what you can fly, and it specifically prohibits vertebrates. I think that might have been a clever way to cover most cases of what might otherwise have been worded "don’t fly your sister’s pet".

Leave a Reply to seatonsnet Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *