From what I know, my family tree traces entirely to Estonia, back to the fog of countless invasions and occupations of my homeland. So it was with some curiosity that I explored my lineage back a few thousand generations and 60,000 years to Africa, and a long period in Iran. My recent ancestors were likely reindeer herders in Siberia, breeding Samoyed white fluffy dogs.

I submitted my DNA anonymously to IBM for a research project, and from the mutations in my Y-chromosome alone, they identified me as haplotype N LLY22G, which pegs the Uralic language of my family and the locale of northern Scandinavia / Eastern Europe. With only my DNA, they identified my family origin on the map above to within a few miles, and traced it back to the veritable “Adam” in Africa, from whom we are all descendants.

And, unaware of any of this, it is odd that, so far in my life, I have adopted two animals from shelters, both Samoyed dogs.

Here is a portion of my Genographic Project report, a fascinating peek into genetic archaeology:

Your Y-chromosome results identify you as a member of haplogroup N.

The genetic markers that define your ancestral history reach back roughly 60,000 years to the first common marker of all non-African men, M168, and follow your lineage to present day, ending with LLY22(G), the defining marker of haplogroup N.

If you look at the map highlighting your ancestors’ route, you will see that members of haplogroup N carry the following Y-chromosome markers:

M168 > M89 > M9 > LLY22(G)

Today, your ancestors are found in northern parts of Scandinavia particularly northern Finland as well as Siberia east of the Altai Mountains, and in northeastern Europe. Many Russians are members of haplogroup N, as are the reindeer-herding Saami people of northern Scandinavia and Russia.

What’s a haplogroup, and why do geneticists concentrate on the Y-chromosome in their search for markers? For that matter, what’s a marker?

Each of us carries DNA that is a combination of genes passed from both our mother and father, giving us traits that range from eye color and height to athleticism and disease susceptibility. One exception is the Y-chromosome, which is passed directly from father to son, unchanged, from generation to generation.

Unchanged, that is unless a mutation—a random, naturally occurring, usually harmless change—occurs. The mutation, known as a marker, acts as a beacon; it can be mapped through generations because it will be passed down from the man in whom it occurred to his sons, their sons, and every male in his family for thousands of years.

Your Ancestral Journey: What We Know Now

M168: Your Earliest Ancestor
Time of Emergence: Roughly 50,000 years ago
Place of Origin: Africa
Climate: Temporary retreat of Ice Age; Africa moves from drought to warmer temperatures and moister conditions
Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Approximately 10,000
Tools and Skills: Stone tools; earliest evidence of art and advanced conceptual skills

The man who gave rise to the first genetic marker in your lineage probably lived in northeast Africa in the region of the Rift Valley. Scientists put the most likely date for when he lived at around 50,000 years ago. His descendants became the only lineage to survive outside of Africa, making him the common ancestor of every non-African man living today.

But why would man have first ventured out of the familiar African hunting grounds and into unexplored lands? It is likely that a fluctuation in climate may have provided the impetus for your ancestors’ exodus out of Africa.

The African ice age was characterized by drought rather than by cold. It was around 50,000 years ago that the ice sheets of northern Europe began to melt, introducing a period of warmer temperatures and moister climate in Africa. Parts of the inhospitable Sahara briefly became habitable. As the drought-ridden desert changed to a savanna, the animals hunted by your ancestors expanded their range and began moving through the newly emerging green corridor of grasslands.

M89: Moving Through the Middle East
Time of Emergence: 45,000 years ago
Place: Middle East
Climate: Semi-arid grass plains
Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of thousands
Tools and Skills: Stone, ivory, wood tools

The next male ancestor in your ancestral lineage is the man who gave rise to M89, a marker found in 90 to 95 percent of all non-Africans. This man was born around 45,000 years ago in northern Africa or the Middle East.

The first people to leave Africa likely followed a coastal route that eventually ended in Australia. Your ancestors followed the expanding grasslands and plentiful game to the Middle East and beyond, and were part of the second great wave of migration out of Africa.

Beginning about 40,000 years ago, the climate shifted once again and became colder and more arid. Drought hit Africa and the grasslands reverted to desert, and for the next 20,000 years, the Saharan Gateway was effectively closed. With the desert impassable, your ancestors had two options: remain in the Middle East, or move on. Retreat back to the home continent was not an option.

While many of the descendants of M89 remained in the Middle East, others continued to follow the great herds of buffalo, antelope, woolly mammoths, and other game through what is now modern-day Iran to the vast steppes of Central Asia.

These semi-arid grass-covered plains formed an ancient “superhighway” stretching from eastern France to Korea. Your ancestors, having migrated north out of Africa into the Middle East, then traveled both east and west along this Central Asian superhighway. A smaller group continued moving north from the Middle East to Anatolia and the Balkans, trading familiar grasslands for forests and high country.

M9: The Eurasian Clan Spreads Wide and Far
Time of Emergence: 40,000 years ago
Place: Iran or southern Central Asia
Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of thousands
Tools and Skills: Upper Paleolithic

Your next ancestor, a man born around 40,000 years ago in Iran or southern Central Asia, gave rise to a genetic marker known as M9, which marked a new lineage diverging from the M89 Middle Eastern Clan. His descendants, of which you are one, spent the next 30,000 years populating much of the planet.

This large lineage, known as the Eurasian Clan, dispersed gradually over thousands of years. Seasoned hunters followed the herds ever eastward, along the vast super highway of Eurasian steppe. Eventually their path was blocked by the massive mountain ranges of south Central Asia—the Hindu Kush, the Tian Shan, and the Himalayas.

The three mountain ranges meet in a region known as the “Pamir Knot,” located in present-day Tajikistan. Here the tribes of hunters split into two groups. Some moved north into Central Asia, others moved south into what is now Pakistan and the Indian subcontinent.

LLY22G: Siberian Marker
Time of Emergence: Within the last 10,000 years
Place of Origin: Siberia
Climate: Present Day
Estimated Number of Homo sapiens: Tens of millions
Tools/Skills: Some hunter-fishers, some farmers
Language: Chiefly found in Uralic-speaking populations

One of the men in a group of Eurasian Clan peoples who traveled north through the Pamir Knot region gave rise to the LLY22G marker, which defines your lineage, haplogroup N.

Today his descendants effectively trace a migration of Uralic-speaking peoples during the last several thousand years. This lineage has dispersed throughout the generations, and is now found in southern parts of Scandinavia as well as northeastern Eurasia. The Saami, an indigenous people of northern Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Russia, traditionally supported themselves with hunting and fishing, their movement dictated by the reindeer herds.

This is where your genetic trail, as we know it today, ends. However, be sure to revisit these pages. As additional data are collected and analyzed, more will be learned about your place in the history of the men and women who first populated the Earth. We will be updating these stories throughout the life of the Genographic Project.

Update: you can get your own test here

61 responses to “Who’s Your Daddy?”

  1. Kevin Kelly said it best – "There should be some counter-balance to the Precautionary Principle. There should be an expiration date on bad ideas. For how many years do you have to be wrong?"

    There have been one trillion GMO meals served to date.

    “We have used the precautionary principle. There is sense of caution first. I think we should use what I call the Proactionary principle. Engage with it first. We can’t predict how technology will happen until we engage with it. This is different with how we first adopted GMOs. Each time a new technology causes a problem, the solution is always a better technology. The response to a bad idea is not to stop thinking but to have a better idea.” (from KK @ Techonomy)

    Will you promise me one thing – not to repeat the same bad argument from South Africa unless you are prepared to defend it? (and ideally, you’d apply that to any statement of fact that you make, but perhaps that is asking too much)

  2. Well , shame on your opining the ‘we’ , the hubris, statistics and lies , J you clearly might have a share or three in the gmo corporation market with such a semantic, verging on an amoral stance. Obama even lied about labelling gmos in the USA a year before he became president , Hilary Clinton is in bed with Wall St Bankers and Monsanto sadly. Your ‘facts’ and inventions are simply not one sided, of the organ damage on actual GE / GMO trials simply gets suppressed , independent scientists fear to lose jobs .
    USA is slow to arrogant not to label their own consumers food that 50 other nations sensibly already have .Some 400 scientists from 60 countries concluded, back in 2008, that genetic engineering was no solution to food shortages in the developing world.
    There seems no civilized defence to not be labeling public food for the public good. One can’t really brow beat the reality or sound the same repeat hyped message, it’s losing credibility even in USA where 40% of the population still have not even heard of gmos , shame on Obama too, who had promised to label these novel ‘foods’ or staple crops and not act like the Bush & Clinton presidencies on this.

    Why not do all the GM trials in the USA why spread the dogma of a false market beyond your boarders a ‘coalition of the willing’ or the unaware?

    Others should Vote for California gmo food labeling for Nov 6th , 2012 Proposition 37 despite the USDA & Monsanto , DuPont , Cargill , Novartis, Bayer lobby $US 25 million to quash the rights suppressed there for the last 14 years.

    Not intending to patronize you back…the ‘better’ idea might be to have a moral compass and stop contaminating even processed food for a few chaps profits.There is always an alternative.
    California considers mandatory regulation and labeling of gmo ingredients
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVfbOjd8MIY
    Best .

  3. Sigh… I started with "You offer a fascinating peek into the anti-GMO debate" and that continues, but with a depressing turn.

    I do not have a share in GMO food (but I have several using GMOs to make chemicals, and non-GMO approaches to improving food yield), but I hope to one day, and hope that companies I am working with can make progress in that area for the betterment of humanity.

    I do not want to get into a broad GMO debate with you. I have one simple, small request – if you quote a number or a statistic, please try to understand numbers and statistics. In the one example of South Africa pesticide use, I tried to show you how your quoted statistic may prove the opposite point of what you were trying to make. But I’m not sure. Instead of defending your statistic, you dismiss it as a "financial" argument. And then the character attacks. Is this the typical defense – if the data does not agree with your hypothesis, the source must be biased and amoral?

    As for morality, unfortunately, there are many sage people who would point the immoral finger at the anti-GMO movement. I wish there was some way to convince you to read and try to objectively internalize some of that, but like politics, I know that it can’t happen with a closed mind. (And, yes, that applies to me as well).

    The first Google hit I found on the topic:

    "Moves to block cultivation of genetically modified crops in the developing world can no longer be tolerated on ethical or moral grounds, the government’s chief scientist, Sir John Beddington, has warned.

    Almost a billion people now suffer serious food shortages and face starvation. "It is unimaginable that in the next 10 to 20 years that there will not be a worsening of that problem unless we take action now, and we have to include the widest possible range of solutions."

    from the Guardian (UK, not U.S.)

  4. South Africans too are sick of being used as a GMO experiment where the risk is socialised , the companies wont pay for problems.As the 8th most common GMO producer and not in the Americas..10 000 hectares of GMO field trials in South Africa! A contamination threat.

    Urgent call for GM maize ban in South Africa.
    http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/51-2012/14240-urgent-call-...

    Yes its very depressing for much of the world who don’t share the minority vision.( J no one has a monopoly on either the truth or genes).
    The banks bailout in USA in 2007/8 not withstanding or reveals the level of greed or corruption .

    Thanks for some honesty about ones own closed mind.Yes you are not alone in the lobby, its not only the USDA ,Monsanto , Cargill , Pioneer Seeds, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and DuPont in United States , there are an elite group of supporters in UK including the ‘Royal Society’, (yet not Prince Charles himself a farmer) Bayer from Germany or Nestles from Switzerland.Though there is far more global diversity in the ‘do no harm’ group including human rights activists, doctors and scientists.

    I will respect this is your picture site and not continue countering your paternalistic opinions after this…..

    "Because we aren’t certain about the effects of GMOs, we must consider one of the guiding principles in science, the precautionary principle. Under this principle, if a policy or action could harm human health or the environment, we must not proceed until we know for sure what the impact will be. And it is up to those proposing the action or policy to prove that it is not harmful."
    — David Suzuki geneticist & environmentalist 2011

    "Unfortunately, it is impossible to verify that genetically modified crops perform as advertised. That is because agritech companies have given themselves veto power over the work of independent researchers."
    — Scientific American Editorial 13.8.2009

    "Most safety studies of genetically modified organisms have been conducted by the corporations that market them. Their results have generally been withheld from independent reviewers, and intellectual property rights restrictions are used to create barriers to conducting independent studies."
    — New York Times letter to editor 2011

    "To think about taking our place in nature instead of conquering it is a deep change in the way we see ourselves and the world. It means changing from binary and linear thinking to a cyclical paradigm that is a new declaration of interdependence."
    — Gloria Steinem 1992

    "But the trouble with genetically modified crops isn’t merely the fact that they’re genetically modified. It’s that they embody so completely the troubling logic of modern agriculture."
    — Verlyn Klinkenborg, editorial board, New York Times 2009

    "When scientists are prevented from examining the raw ingredients in our nation’s food supply or from testing the plant material that covers a large portion of the country’s agricultural land, the restrictions on free inquiry become dangerous."
    — Scientific American Editorial 13.8.2009

    The GMO experiment, carried out in real time and with our entire food and ecological system as its laboratory, is perhaps the greatest case of human hubris/arrogance ever. It creates yet another systemic, “too big too fail” enterprise — but one for which no bailouts will be possible when it fails. The GMO experiment has the potential to destroy the planet, according to Distinguished Professor or Risk Engineering, Dr. Nassim Nicholas Taleb.

    Marilize
    South Africa
    "There is already NO porridge in South Africa that I can find on the shelves that isn’t a GMO product according to the labels. I can’t eat porridge anymore! It was staple diet to us, now I get constipation, cramps on my stomach, and am very bloated if I eat porridge. It also doesn’t make me full it I eat it. If the porridge stand a day and I want to eat it the next day, it is ROCK solid hard. PLEASE take the GMO ‘s out of our food that it can fill us again and don’t make us so sick!!"

  5. A lot of Swedes settled parts of Estonia (Estland to Swedes) and of course Russia, we could be distant relatives.

  6. If you have samples analyzed by 23andme or Ancestry.com, you can use those results on GedMatch to see where your genes match ancient DNA from 50,000 years ago. I am a proud of my heritage from Clovis, Denisovan and Neanderthal, etc. twitter.com/NicholasMeyler/status/738832815593127938

  7. Steve Jurvetson: Estonians have the highest level of WEHG (Western European Hunter Gatherer) genetic markers (almost as high as mine)… wondering if "Headhunting" is a genetic proclivity.

Leave a Reply to mikescottnz Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *