DMC-FX7
ƒ/5.6
5.8 mm
1/640
80

For the rocketry hobbyist:
A number of the mid-power rockets, such as the G and H class rockets from Public Missiles and LOC Precision, have a bare engine tube with instructions on how to use many layers of masking tape on each launch to hold the engine firmly. It seemed inelegant to me for a motor of that size to depend on tape to avoid a couple of catastrophic failure modes. So I jerry-rigged a stable motor mount that has to be incorporated from the beginning of the rocket build. It works especially well for engine clusters; running the screw down the center of 3 engine tubes can secure 3 engines with one bolt.

The wing nut holds the engine from the rear, and adjusts for measurement error. I pass the headless screw through a hole drilled through the rear disc and epoxy it to the motor tube. I drill a pair of holes at one engine’s length up the tube and epoxy a straightened paper clip through the center of the motor tube. This holds the motor from the other side.

While making these mods, I place another paper clip through farther up to secure a wad of steel wool to capture the ejection charge sparks (so I won’t have to use fireproof paper on every launch).

Given the screw sticking down from the bottom, the motor tube should be mounted a bit higher in the airframe if you want the rocket to be freestanding on a flat floor. That may require planning around the fin placement. It was not a problem for this LOC Precision Norad.

5 responses to “Modified Rocket Motor Mount”

  1. You might want to reconsider the steel wool. Steel wool will burn.

  2. Ah, very good point. I might have used the wrong term (or maybe I have been lucky so far…). It was more like a steel scouring pad with fairly thick strands. It looked a lot like the ones that Aerotech ships with their rocket kits.

  3. Now there’s a man who takes his hobbies seriously – and nothing wrong with that either – work hard, play hard is definately the way to go !

    What kind of heights & ranges can you get with these things ?

    I’ve often seen the basic kits you can get in some stores these days and wondered whether they were worth playing with… (I’m a sucker for anything that goes up into the blue)

    Btw – did you see this fantastic shot of a "Reverse Rocket" – Ashkan spotted it & I think its great ! (tho I kind of suspect that a bit of a jump was involved as well !!!)

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/sleepallday/147474990/

  4. thanks for the pointer! Very fun photo that one.

    On rockets, I am only Level 1 certified, so I go up about a half mile on the bigger engines.

    Out in the Black Rock Desert, I plan to jam a J570 motor in my little Thug rocket… and if it survives the transition to Mach 2, it would go 1.5 miles up (according to RockSim)…. But, much more likely, the paint would burn off and the structure would shred from the supersonic transition. =)

    I’ve seen an attempt at 100K ft. (Hard to imagine seeing that from a jet cruising at 30K feet….) They even had a prop plane dedicated to recovery efforts.

  5. Only one word to describe that – AWESOME ! – & good luck with the Thug !

    You gotta video it – even if you don’t keep the rocket in shot, you’ve just got to get your first sonic boom on tape !

    My brother-in-law is heavily into aeromodelling (ex. British Champion at control line combat & radio control pylon racing) & has a number of 2 1/2cc glow plug engines that do 78,000 rpm on alcohol fuels which use carbon props (plastic would stretch out of shape) to drag his models around at 150-180mph. He’s not yet got to rockets but, last weekend, he successfully flight tested his first jet – in a 2 metre wingspan radio controlled plane that will do 200mph plus – or at least, that’s what he’s expecting. Unfortunately, I wasn’t there to see it – but I’m hoping to be next time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *