iPhone 12 Pro Max
ƒ/1.6
5.1 mm
1/6,250
32

What we know for sure is that this is a very usual meteorite, made of creamy crystals, it’s an extraterrestrial pegmatite.

A recent paper proposes that aubrites (a class of similar meteorites like this one), are samples of ancient Mercury, parts of its mantle that were blasted off in a massive collision, removing a third of its mass. Some of the material ended up in the asteroid belt, pushed by the intense solar winds or that epoch, forming the E-type asteroids. And like many other asteroids, various gravitational resonances with Jupiter eventually flung this material to Earth, a time capsule from the formative years of our solar system.

OK, so what supports this hypothesis? First, isotope analysis shows the aubrites left their parent body 4.563 billion years ago (20 million years before Earth formed). Our solar system is 4.567 billion years old.

We also know it was a crazy violent time back then. Entire planets were flung out of our solar system to drift away in cold, dead space. A planet the size of Mars smashed into Earth and ejected enough material to form our moon. Mercury came out of this rock fight looking very strange; it is very dense with a meager mantle compared to its heavy iron core. The aubrites might shed light on the formative years.

“They seem to match scientific models of conditions on the planet Mercury in earlier days of the solar system. We have often said that aubrites are very good analogues for Mercury.” — Dr. Camille Cartier, a planetary scientist at the University of Lorraine in France in the NYT. “Data from NASA’s Messenger spacecraft that orbited Mercury from 2011 to 2015 supports similarities between Mercury’s composition and aubrites. ‘I think aubrites are the shallowest portions of the mantle of a large proto-Mercury,’ Dr. Cartier said. ‘This could resolve the origin of Mercury.’”

The BepiColombo mission is on its way to Mercury now and will try to test the hypothesis by measuring the planet’s nickel at the surface. If confirmatory, a meteoriticist colleague on FB summarized: “aubrites may suddenly be promoted from an oddity into some of the most remarkable meteorites ever collected — pieces of the solar system’s innermost world.”

Now, of the aubrites, this 2.4kg aubrite pegmatite is quite unique. It was found this year in Mali, and will be called Wad Alhath. It does not look like any other meteorite I have seen. It is almost entirely enstatite — a mineral common to the early stages of crystalline silicate formation in space. It’s one of the few silicate minerals observed outside the Solar System, particularly around evolved stars and planetary nebulae such as NGC 6302. Pegmatite is the crystal form, an orthorhombic and centrosymmtric cluster of crystals.

This aubrite has the highest concentration of enstatite (98%) and lowest iron (undetectable) of any aubrite. It makes for a beautiful enigma.

Here are some more technical details on the Mercury hypothesis from the scientific paper:

“Large proto-Mercury models match AuPB’s [Aubrite Parent Body, the place it came from] inferred characteristics: Aubrites share similar exotic mineralogies with Mercury’s lavas and are therefore regarded as potential analogues to Mercury’s crust.

A long-standing idea holds that proto-Mercury once possessed a larger silicate mantle that was removed by an early giant impact(s). N-body numerical simulations of solar system formation systematically predict bigger Mercury analogues, with 0.2 to 0.6 Earth masses. All these models are consistent with P recorded by Ni and Co Dmetal/silicate in the AuPB. Ni and Co abundances in aubrites support an AuPB with a mass of 0.3 to 0.8 Earth mass”

•E-type asteroids as the secondary aubrite parent body: “E-type asteroids are rubble pile asteroids with reflectance spectra and low densities consistent with an aubritic composition. They are located in the innermost belt, forming a large proportion of the Hungaria population, and encountered among the Apollo near-Earth asteroid group. Their orbits are consistent with the fall dates and the long cosmic ray exposure ages of aubrites, supporting the idea that they are the immediate source body of these meteorites. E-type asteroids represent a total mass of ~1.46*1018kg, which represents only a few ppm of the material that would be stripped out by a giant impact on a large proto-Mercury. The age of aubrites coincides with an early epoch during which the Sun’s wind, magnetic field strength and rotation rate each greatly exceeded their present-day value. We propose that following a giant impact, this early wind would have provided sufficient drag upon ejected debris to remove them from Mercury-crossing trajectories and generated a tailwind upon debris, propelling them to greater orbital radii”

• Implications for inner solar system early history: “In the scenario of a giant impact occurring onto a large proto-Mercury and sending some small debris up to the Hungaria region, it is likely that large amounts of ejected debris are gravitationally captured by the inner planets during their outward course. Up to 20% of escaped particles could collide with Venus, and about 5% with Earth. If proto-Mercury was 0.3 to 0.8 Earth masses and lost most of its mantle, that would potentially represent ~ 1% to 2.5% Earth mass of aubritic material accreting to the Earth.”

If so, we are not just “made of stars” but a bit of Mercury too.

3 responses to “A Messenger from Mercury? The Wad Alhath Aubrite Pegmatite”

  1. Head shotFrom theNYT: "Mercury does not make sense. It is a bizarre hunk of rock with a composition that is unlike its neighboring rocky planets.

    “It’s way too dense,” said David Rothery, a planetary scientist at the Open University in England.

    Most of the planet, the closest to the sun, is taken up by its core. It lacks a thick mantle like Earth has, and no one is quite sure why. One possibility is that the planet used to be much bigger — perhaps twice its current bulk or more. Billions of years ago, this fledgling proto-Mercury, or super Mercury, could have been hit by a large object, stripping away its outer layers and leaving the remnant we see behind.

    In work presented at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston in March, Camille Cartier, a planetary scientist at the University of Lorraine in France, and colleagues said pieces of this proto-Mercury may be hiding in museums and other meteorite collections. Studying them could unlock the planet’s mysteries.

    “We don’t have any samples of Mercury” at the moment, said Dr. Cartier. Gaining such specimens “would be a small revolution” in understanding the natural history of the solar system’s smallest planet.

    Among a small number of meteorite collections are a rare type of space rock called aubrites. Named after the village Aubres in France, where the first meteorite of this type was found in 1836, aubrites are pale in color and contain small amounts of metal. They are low in oxygen and seem to have formed in an ocean of magma.

    For these reasons, they seem to match scientific models of conditions on the planet Mercury in earlier days of the solar system. “We have often said that aubrites are very good analogues for Mercury,” Dr. Cartier said.

    Following from the hypothesis that a sizable object collided with a younger Mercury, Dr. Cartier said a large amount of material would have been thrown into space, about a third of the planet’s mass. A small amount of that debris would have been pushed by the solar wind into what is now the asteroid belt, forming the E-type asteroids.

    There, the asteroids would have remained for billions of years, occasionally smashing together and being continually blasted by the solar wind, explaining the solar wind fingerprint seen in aubrites. But eventually, she suggested, some pieces were pushed toward Earth and fell to our planet as aubritic meteorites.

    Low levels of nickel and cobalt found in aubrites match what we would expect from the proto-Mercury, Dr. Cartier says, while data from NASA’s Messenger spacecraft that orbited Mercury from 2011 to 2015 supports similarities between Mercury’s composition and aubrites.

    “I think aubrites are the shallowest portions of the mantle of a large proto-Mercury,” Dr. Cartier said. “This could resolve the origin of Mercury.”

    Christopher Spalding, an expert in planet formation at Princeton University and a co-author of Dr. Cartier’s study, says his modeling shows the solar wind can push material away from Mercury sufficiently to link it to E-type asteroids.

    “The young sun was highly magnetic and spinning fast,” he said, turning the solar wind into a “whirlpool” that could send pieces of Mercury to the asteroid belt.

    Dr. Cartier’s proposal could be put to the test soon. A joint European-Japanese space mission called BepiColombo is currently on its way to orbit Mercury in December 2025. Dr. Cartier presented her idea to a group of BepiColombo scientists in early May.

    “I was impressed by it,” said Dr. Rothery, a member of the BepiColombo science team. He said their mission could look for evidence of nickel in Mercury’s surface that would link the planet more conclusively to collected aubrites.

    Willy Benz, an astrophysicist from the University of Bern in Switzerland who first proposed the idea of a proto-Mercury, says that if aubrites do come from Mercury, they will add to evidence of an active and violent early solar system.

    “It will show that giant impacts are quite common,” he said, and that they “play an important role in shaping the architectures of planetary systems.”

    And from the technical paper:"A chemical continuum between aubrites and Mercury’s surface: When plotted against Mg/Al, we observe a continuum for all major, minor and trace elements (Fig. 2). We interpret these global trends as illustrating the fractionation of mineral phases in a primitive magmatic episode of Mercury after the metal core was formed. In this context, aubrites would have been extracted from the shallow and sulfide-poor mantle of proto-Mercury"

  2. Thanks Steve incredible information.

Leave a Reply to Ro-bot-tens Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *