Canon EOS 5D Mark II
ƒ/2.8
100 mm
1/160
2500

Gore remained seated; I wish I would have looked to see if he clapped at all but I was looking through the DSLR to take photos. I wish I had appreciated how epic this moment was at the time, but I had forgotten that Gore blamed Lewinsky for his loss.

Quotes from her TED Talk:

“At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences.”

“You’re looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decade. Obviously, that’s changed, but only recently.”

“a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He could make me feel 22 again. (Laughter) I realized later that night, I’m probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again.”

“What that meant for me personally was that overnight I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one worldwide. I was patient zero of losing a personal reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously.”

“My mom… was reliving 1998, reliving a time when she sat by my bed every night, reliving a time when she made me shower with the bathroom door open, and reliving a time when both of my parents feared that I would be humiliated to death, literally.”

“A marketplace has emerged where public humiliation is a commodity and shame is an industry. How is the money made? Clicks. The more shame, the more clicks. The more clicks, the more advertising dollars. We’re in a dangerous cycle. The more we click on this kind of gossip, the more numb we get to the human lives behind it, and the more numb we get, the more we click. All the while, someone is making money off of the back of someone else’s suffering.”

“Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop.” “We need to return to a long-held value of compassion and empathy.” “Shame can’t survive empathy.”

From a Facebook discussion about this photo, someone proposed that maybe she is a fabulous person, a possibility that never occurred to me prior. Having seen her in person for the first time (she even invited me to lunch), I can now understand the question, as she has been re-humanized from the abstract projection we saw in the media. The headlines and labels de-humanize the specific person and evoke a penumbra of associations, where headline readers fill the gaps in our minds with the stereotype or mental model of an “actor” like this. It feels like the common strategy of de-humanizing the enemy in wartime.

2 responses to “Monica Lewinsky receiving a standing ovation at TED, and looking right at Al Gore sitting next to me”

  1. Giving Chris Anderson a hug right after the talk: IMG_7007And with the other great speakers in the "Justice and Injustice" lineup: DSC05951
    Watch her TED Talk.

  2. One big fact is that her most vicious attackers and the major powers against her were sure not guys on the internet, or any other media but her ex boss and his group’s attacks on her character. By far. Without the dress they would have succeeded in completely destroying her character.
    I forgot some of the interesting details that led up to the pattern of cornered rat behavior noted by Richard Posner. I don’t think it would have remained secret however:

    Lawyers for Clinton argued that the Jones suit would distract him from the important tasks of his office and should not be allowed to go forward while he occupied the White House. Clinton’s immunity claim eventually reached the United States Supreme Court. The Court ruled unanimously in May, 1997 against the President, and allowed discovery in the case to proceed. As Federal Appeals Court Judge (and Reagan appointee) Richard A. Posner noted in An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton, the Court’s "inept," "unpragmatic," and "backward-looking" decision in Clinton v Jones, and an earlier decision by the Court upholding the constitutionality of the act authorizing the appointment of independent counsels, had major consequences:

    "Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky, an affair intrinsically devoid of significance to anyone except Lewinsky, would have remained a secret from the public. The public would not have been worse for not knowing about it. There would have been no impeachment inquiry, no impeachment, no concerns about the motives behind the President’s military actions against terrorists and rogue states in the summer and fall of 1998, no spectacle of the United States Senate play-acting at adjudication. The Supreme Court’s decisions created a situation that led the President and his defenders into the pattern of cornered-rat behavior that engendered a constitutional storm and that may have embittered American politics, weakened the Presidency, distracted the federal government from essential business, and undermined the rule of law."

    Not exactly Dredd Scott in consequence but more interesting, and no civil war.
    law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/clinton/clintontri…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *