I am so glad that my son demanded that his allowance and related monetary exchanges switch to bitcoin last year. The fixed transaction costs were so high relative to the $20 price/coin that we naturally banked a bunch of them to cover anticipated needs. =)

Long blog post I made at the time (text buried under “more” in right column):
www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/8410385932/

Detailed view of first transaction, with many senders:
blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc1…

And the subsequent split four minutes later; the $210M divided into two accounts ($113M and $97M each):
blockchain.info/tx/1746d7d24fa39c7f3b62f64a1760649b616f36…

And then it fragments further. Here is the tree diagram (click on a leaf node to expand the tree): blockchain.info/tree/98324324

I know where this is going…
www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/8416015258

8 responses to “The Largest Bitcoin Transaction Ever = $210M at today’s exchange rate”

  1. trying to bend my mind on this whole mining thing….

  2. (Shit load of money!)

  3. a metric sh*tload baby!

  4. Is this a bubble forming or a bubble about to burst? Or, is this the next evolution in monetary systems?

  5. @gsikich1 – From the Economist today:

    "ALL currencies involve some measure of consensual hallucination, but Bitcoin, a virtual monetary system, involves more than most.

    The system is now straining at the seams. Its computational underpinnings have collectively reached 100 times the performance of the world’s top 500 supercomputers combined: more than 50,000 petaflops. Bitcoin’s success has revealed three weaknesses in particular. It is not as secure and anonymous as it seems; the “mining” system that both increases the Bitcoin supply and ensures the integrity of the currency has led to an unsustainable computational arms-race; and the distributed-ledger system is becoming unwieldy. Will Bitcoin’s self-correcting mechanisms, and the enlightened self-interest of its users, be able to address these weaknesses and keep Bitcoin on the rails?"

  6. Ah, it always bugs me to see people trying to represent (or compare) the bitcoin mining network compute power in terms of petaflops… Because the actual number of petaflops in the entire bitcoin mining operation is exactly zero.
    Seems a few bitcoin sites are listing a petaflops number derived from the raw hashrate by assuming that everyone was using the same GPU for mining, which was ridiculous enough then, and is completely useless now that >95% of the hashrate is coming from custom highly optimized ASICs that are incapable of any sort of general purpose operation.
    Origin of the madness: bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4689.0

  7. @Steve Jurvetson A bit of risk at this stage, although an impressive accomplishment on computational measures. The three weaknesses would be of particular concern – potential "currency war" scenario.

  8. Be careful! A kid that would rather have bitcoins than hard cash may grow up to be a Milo Minderbinder, Cria cuervos.. <|:^)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *