Canon PowerShot S100
ƒ/2.2
5.2 mm
1/30
80

Charles Chase summarizes the benefits: “The fuel (two isotopes of Hydrogen) has six orders of magnitude higher energy density than oil. You can’t make a bomb from it, and it has no meltdown risk. It’s very different from nuclear fission reactors.”

Looking for a better name, I suggested that they call it “sequestered solar”.

The Tokamak reactor on screen is 30m tall, 23K tons, $20B, 1 million parts and may be operational by 2040. Lockheed is working on a compact 100MW high-Beta reactor (below) that should be about 2x2x4 meters. They hope to have a prototype working by 2017, to be able to meet global baseload energy demand by 2050, in time to have an impact on our climate.

9 responses to “Lockheed Martin Skunkworks – Nuclear Fusion Project”

  1. Did I miss something? Has sustainable, controllable, fusion been demonstrated? For years, I’d been waiting/hoping to hear something from LLL, but…..

    With the LM Skunkworks cachet behind it, one’s hope might be raised…. ???

    BTW, is that 100mW (milliwatt), or a 100 MW (megawatt) reactor in the 2nd para? The former might indicate a demo model, the later doesn’t seem feasible in that package size? But I’m often amazed by new technology…. =8-o

  2. Mega – fixed the caps typo. No, they have not achieved net positive generation, but they are predicting that they will with a Beta (plasma pressure/magnetic pressure) now of almost one. There’s some clever mechanism they have for a self-tuning feedback mechanism whereby the magnetic field increases as you go out farther from the center of the plasma. I did not see a diagram of it, but it’s visible in the "T4 Experiment" in purple above. He contrasted that with the rotating plasma in a Tokamak where the magnetic field dies out with distance from the center.

    Of course, Moses also predicted that they were just months away… in 2010…
    Nuclear Fusion Reactor

    …and 2009…
    Can we make a Star?

  3. Thanks for the link to the video. Interesting. I’ll keep my Exxon stocks for now, but continue to hope for that breakthrough. A fusion powered world will be unrecognizable to us mere fossil fuel users. Hard to imagine the possibilities…

  4. So this a plan for 2050 🙂

  5. Now could we get Lockheed interested in aneutronic fuels/dense plasma focus?

  6. As a grad student interested in magnetic fusion I’m blown away by this announcement. This is the most credible "we’re close to fusion" talk I’ve yet seen, and I’m really surprised they kept this secret since the magnetic fusion community is relatively small and the research published openly, even during the height of the cold war.

    Its also the only talk on fusion to mention getting to Mars quickly (my other interest) that didn’t cause me to instinctively roll my eyes, since its Lockheed.

    Interesting timing announcing this right as one of the big three experiments in the US, Alcator C-Mod at MIT, is being shut down.
    tech.mit.edu/V132/N65/cmod.html

  7. " in time to have an impact on our climate."

    Fixing the climate models so they have predictive power will have a bigger effect on climate. Assuming that models have any effect on climate what so ever. Their biggest effect appears to be on funding.

Leave a Reply to DMShannon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *