Canon PowerShot S100
ƒ/4
5.2 mm
1/500
80

My father-in-law has traced the family tree back to the year 950, through the fog of feudal spats and jousting competitions. In the distant past, some of the best data came from tax documents, often paid with farm animals, as dutifully recorded in preserved documents.

So we visited the tiny town of Dinkelenberg, and is now Germany, but was Hesse at the time. The Tinklenberg name that descended from there is now my middle name.

We found one English speaker, this smiling girl who was grooming her horse, with a captivating sparkle in her eye, and the look of a distant relative. Then the break truck arrived, and it all seemed like a land lost in time.

And it reminded me of an old blog post I wrote on my second visit to Skype Estonia:
“I stumbled across a nugget of sculptured prose from Patti Smith, which eloquently captures the resonant emotional filtration of a newfound friend and, in a more abstract way, the curious cultural immersion I felt in my Estonian homeland:

“There are those whom we seek and there are those whom we find. Occasionally we find – however fractured the relativity – one we recognize as kin. In doing so, certain curious aspects of character recede and we happily magnify the common ground.”

22 responses to “Kinship”

  1. even the horse looked familiar… but I had to check my flickr archives… and I called it Atavism
    Atavism

    In 1368, Dinkelberg merged with the newer town of Vockerode (which celebrates its 1266 founding in stone):
    IMG_1259

    Our quest fulfilled! We found the old family crest inside a display case in the firehouse (which also served as city hall as it is the only government building in the town):
    IMG_1376

  2. So you are actually related? That’s pretty cool.

  3. beautiful!!
    it’s always lovely to come across kin.

  4. i have kinship to this place too (together with a few other places in the world)… 🙂 and horses are always so cuddly….

  5. An author I knew named Guy Murchie once told me that every human being in the world is at least a 20th cousin of every other human being. Seems he had done the math.

  6. I find it even more interesting that this young girl, half a world away, would not be out of place walking down the streets of any major US city. Having spend a few years living in Europe in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s I still find this intriguing. Back then people still had relatively distinct styles and attire. Mass media and the internet have changed all that in less than 25 years.

    On the other hand, knowing your propensity for perfection I wonder how long it will take you to trace your roots all the way back to Lucy? Keep posting! I always enjoy reading your posts.

  7. > Dr DAD – yes, isn’t that just terrible? the conformism depresses and bores me.

  8. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/scleroplex] Cultural identity cuts both ways. It is indeed a shame to lose the ideas unique to a group of people, but the more similar we all are, the harder it is to find things to kill each other about.

    When I lived in Kenya, two large tribes were clashing. Many people refused to speak while on public transport because their accent might identify them, after which people sometimes had their hands cut off by fellow passengers. But so long as everyone was mum, they couldn’t even identify their enemies.

  9. > the harder it is to find things to kill each other about

    they’ll always find something but in the meantime everyone will look boring…….

    take the Falklands war.
    it was not about the spanish language…..

  10. Our family tree goes back to 1853 when moms dad married a 13 yr old and brought her over from Europe, had 14 kids BTW.before that it’s all a blur on Moms side and dad had his hometown in Slovakia flooded by a dam in 1907 and all records and cemetary was lost or underwater

  11. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/drdad] — I wonder how long it will take you to trace your roots all the way back to Lucy?

    Going back through pre-history, before written language, requires a bit of genetic archaeology. Getting to Lucy is a bit trick because we rely on the bit of DNA in the mitochondria that passes down exclusively from mother to child. So, I have only traced that back 40,000 years and found she was messing with the Neanderthals. =)

    For the paternal line, we can rely on the Y-chromosome because the XX ladies never get a taste of that one, so there is no mixing down the line. (as an aside, it’s fascinating how the battle of the sexes plays out over millennia; Y has withered over time under constant attack by X. Y has a number of cool survival tricks, like using extensive genetic palindromes as an encrypted error correcting code).

    Here is my trace back to Adam
    Who’s Your Daddy?

    with some amazing details, all derived from just my DNA. They did not even know my name.

    I picked up a bit of Finnish along the way.

    What’s next? I will post my entire genome and oral microbiome…

    Sneak peak: I have 4,028,419 SNPs, or point mutations from the reference standard, which is a pool of data biased toward Caucasians like Craig Venter and James Watson who were early contributors of their personal genomes. Most Caucasians sequenced against that reference pool will have 2.5 – 3 million SNPs. The CEO of the gene-sequencer company Illumina has 2.2 million SNPs, and the CTO has the most I know of, at 4.6 million. He is from Iran. My paternal line spent 40,000 years hanging out in Iran before heading North to Estonia.

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/scleroplex] and [http://www.flickr.com/photos/ukweli] — when the physical looks are the same, or blend over time, many shift to cognitive racism, and when enshrined in certain institutions, you can find entire cultures that see no problem in discriminating among people based entirely on what they believe. Of course, they don’t like to discuss it that way; they are simply the chosen ones.

  12. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] That’s really what I was getting at. The phenomenon I witnessed in Kenya was among people who could not even distinguish their "enemies" physically, so they focused on cultural cues. And it may be that like an underemployed immune system overreacting to allergens, this sensitivity just continues to refine as differences among people decrease.

  13. and consider the places on the planet where you see inter-generational conflict… Think of the upsetting headlines from around the globe. Consider India-Pakistan. That example, just one of many, makes me shudder. See the inserted Harris text here, and some the modern splinter cells.

  14. Pakistan didn’t exist till 65 years ago, so it’s not a historic conflict continuing over generations. the british needed an ‘island’ to continue their machinations in the area, just like belize, oman, guyana, diego garcia, cyprus etc. so they created Pakistan via Jinnah, who very much regretted it before he died.

    http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/images/topics/bundles/fo371-6...

    and only people who believe Reuters or the AP actually swallow the inevitable adjectives "traditional arch rivals India and Pakistan"….. as Goebbels said, a lie needs to be constantly repeated. those large intelligence budgets need to be spent somewhere………
    no Indian or Pakistani paper or reporter uses those adjectives.

    and it sure wasn’t India or Pakistan who got rid of Zia Ul-Haq three days before he was to sign a permanent peace treaty with India.

    http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/jul/16spec.htm

    here is another example of "depressing sameness" –
    http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/08/13/unlivable_citie...

  15. Yes, and I hope scleroplex is right as well, that the conflict born of a political schism does not have any reason to propagate into the future, and the HIndus and Muslims will find that they have no quarrel once the external meddling stops. Same for the Middle East.

  16. I don’t know why people think there will be peace if the west pulls out of the east. They’ve been at war since forever and that’s not going to change. Wars will still be fought, just with less impressive weapons.

    I’m not suggesting that we should be there at all, we shouldn’t.

  17. the worst wars in history have been exclusively within europe.
    by many orders of magnitude.
    both "World" Wars were european wars primarily,
    the first one exclusively.
    which is why it is essential that the EU succeeds.

  18. Pinker offers a counterpoint

    and message of hope in his conclusion:
    "Violence has been in decline over long stretches of time, and we may be living in the most peaceful time in our species’ existence."

    or this table, not adjusted for population growth:

    Rank, Deaths, Cause, Centuries
    1 66 million Second World War 20C
    2 40 million Mao Zedong (mostly famine) 20C
    3 40 million Genghis Khan 13C
    4 27 million British India (mostly famine) 19C
    5 25 million Fall of the Ming Dynasty 17C
    6 20 million Taiping Rebellion 19C
    7 20 million Joseph Stalin 20C
    8 18½ million Mideast Slave Trade 7C-19C
    9 17 million Timur Lenk 14C-15C
    10 16 million Atlantic Slave Trade 15C-19C
    11 15 million First World War 20C
    12 15 million Conquest of the Americas 15C-19C
    13 13 million An Lushan Revolt 8C
    14 10 million Xin Dynasty 1C
    15 10 million Congo Free State 19C-20C
    16 9 million Russian Civil War 20C
    17 7½ million Thirty Years War 17C
    18 7½ million Fall of the Yuan Dynasty 14C
    19 7 million Fall of Rome 5C
    20 7 million Chinese Civil Wars 20C

    And there are the unknown ones, not on the list. For example, the conquest of India by the Muslims has some wild estimates that would make it top of the list (although that is unlikely, it was a big one). That site goes on to reference:
    "The Mohammedan Conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history."
    "during the really nasty years of the conquest, the chronicles claim that Muslims were killing 100,000 Hindu infidels per year" and the conquest went on for 700 years.

    I have not studied that history, but it sounds like the conflict goes back more than 65 years.

  19. The Mohammedan Conquest of India was indeed as bloody as you write.
    Pakistan however is very new, so they’ve been "traditional arch rivals" for only 65 years.

    The effect of the forced imposition of an alien culture led to numerous changes in the daily lives of Hindus in areas under their occupation compared to Hindus in parts of India that never came under Muslim rule.

    For example, in occupied areas the temple priests were all killed and so layfolk took over the task of keeping the temple lamp lit and daily traditions completed whereas in the southern areas the priests continued as before and temple sanctums continue to be off-limits to layfolk.

    A similar change was seen in Communist East Europe where layfolk took over the function of the churches, for example in Czechoslovakia.

    Another example – Hindu weddings in areas under Muslim occupation started taking place at midnight because too many brides and the wealth that travelled with them to their new home were kidnapped and stolen by the Muslim invaders. Whereas in the unoccupied southern areas weddings continue to take place in the morning and through the day.

    The Mohammedan Conquest of Indonesia was also extremely bloody with 90% of the Hindu population either killed or converted except for a small surviving population of Hindus on the island of Bali.

    And the Hindu mountain range Pariyatra Parvat was renamed the Hindu Kush (Hindu Killer) by the invading Mohammedans, a name that easily survives with no controversy to this day.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_Kush

    However, the occupying Muslims did over time develop a sense of identity and belonging which is why during the war of Independence of 1857, all of India, still a Hindu majority land, restored the Mughal King Bahadur Shah Zafar, to the Throne in Delhi.

    That realisation led the British to come up with the Partition of Bengal and all else that followed.

    "In 1919, separate elections were established for Muslims and Hindus. Before this, many members of both communities had advocated national solidarity of all Bengalis. Now, distinctive communities developed, with their own political agendas."

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_Bengal_(1905)

    And even where there is almost no ethnic difference, it can be created, as the Belgians proved in Rwanda. The Belgians introduced ID cards in the 1920s following exactly the same principles also implemented by the Nazi Government in Germany and deliberately created a rigid separation between two hitherto fluid groups, the Tutsis and the Hutus. The way people were assigned a Tutsi card vs. a Hutu card was exactly like the way Dr Ritter et al decided if someone was a Gypsy or not. And that card determined your whole life.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Rwanda#Belgian_colonialism
    The effect was seen in 1994.

    Belgian Rwanda was a real life demonstration of Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Project where people were randomly assigned roles which then became all too real.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

    I thank you for writing out the list above.
    Too few people know this and no schools teach this to children.

    A good recent book on Mao’s famines – http://www.flickr.com/photos/scleroplex/6167543664/

    Another book you may find interesting is Roy Moxham’s "Great Hedge of India" –
    http://www.roymoxham.com/page4.htm
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inland_Customs_Line

  20. Very sad statistics, helps to put things in perspective…

  21. and if anyone needed proof that the Partition in 1947 and the creation of Pakistan was a fraud, here it is –

    online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443324404577595733…

    this is what was happening before the Partition and is happening still.
    before this was the three day assault on Mumbai in 2008 and before that the train set ablaze in Gujarat.

    the people are panicking now in the absence of any actual violence in Bangalore (that’s a misleading headline if there ever was one) because they know the Congress Party has never ever protected Hindus from Muslim attacks. not before Partition or after. so they are fleeing for home because they know Manmohan + Sonia’s Government is not going to protect them.

    the people who sent the fake SMS-es know this too.
    a successful con requires intimate knowledge and situational awareness.

    if Congress-led governments had ever protected Hindus from Muslim attacks, this con would not have worked.

    also see – http://www.flickr.com/photos/scleroplex/5470355008/

  22. here is the latest "arch rival" propaganda –

    "21 AUGUST 2012 – 11H07
    India cracks down on Internet over migrant exodus

    AFP – India has demanded social networking websites take down provocative messages and has blocked some online content after anonymous threats sparked an exodus of migrants from several cities.

    Tens of thousands of workers and students from the remote northeast region returned home last week fearing attacks from Muslims in reprisal for recent ethnic clashes in the state of Assam.

    The Indian government has said many of the Internet posts, fake video clips and phone messages spreading rumours of plans to target migrants were sent from arch-rival Pakistan."

    now that i’ve raised your consciousness on this point, you will see it everywhere.

    it is also entirely typical that the Congress Party is using this tragedy to further censor the Internet, in addition to ongoing criminal prosecutions of Google and FaceBook, rather than reassure non-Muslims in Post-Partition India that the Congress Party will prevent further attacks by Muslims.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jwPEhfWgknwwJ...

    after all, it is the Internet that is the main problem here……

    instead of "arch-rival Pakistan" one may substitute Airstrip One, Eurasia, Eastasia or Oceania

Leave a Reply to jurvetson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *