Canon EOS 5D Mark II
ƒ/6.3
50 mm
1/200
640

Consuming these two was a cognitive speedball. =)

First came Larry Lessig’s downer book on the systemic corruption of Congress by the campaign contributions of companies and special interest groups, which corrodes our democracy and is at the root of our broken political system. For me, a newbie to all things political, the bizarre patterns of behavior in D.C. finally made sense.

You can read the opening chapter of Republic Lost over at Rolling Stone:

“Government is an embarrassment. It has lost the capacity to make the most essential decisions.”

“Everything our government touches— from health care to Social Security to the monopoly rights we call patents and copyright— it poisons. Yet our leaders seem oblivious to the thought that there’s anything that needs fixing. They preen about, ignoring the elephant in the room. They act as if Ben Franklin would be proud.”

“We must remember that harm sometimes comes from timid, even pathetic souls. That the enemy doesn’t always march. Sometimes it simply shuffles.”

“The great evil that we as Americans face is the banal evil of second-rate minds who can’t make it in the private sector and who therefore turn to the massive wealth directed by our government as the means to securing wealth for themselves.”

“This corruption has two elements, each of which feeds the other. The first element is bad governance, which means simply that our government doesn’t track the expressed will of the people, whether on the Left or on the Right. Instead, the government tracks a different interest, one not directly affected by votes or voters. Democracy, on this account, seems a show or a ruse; power rests elsewhere.

The second element is lost trust: when democracy seems a charade, we lose faith in its process. That doesn’t matter to some of us— we will vote and participate regardless. But to more rational souls, the charade is a signal: spend your time elsewhere, because this game is not for real. Participation thus declines, especially among the sensible middle. Policy gets driven by the extremists at both ends.”

“In a poll commissioned for this book, 75% of Americans believe ‘campaign contributions buy results in Congress.’” (p.88)

“in the most critical cases, the vast majority of contributions to a congressional campaign are not even from the voters in that district. 79% of contributions to California state legislators came from out-of-district contributors. It is clear ‘the funders’ are not ‘the People.’” (p.233)

Larry just spoke in San Francisco to the Long Now Foundation, available here

Chapter One opens with “In the summer of 1991, I spent a month alone on a beach in Costa Rica, reading novels.” And there I was in Costa Rica reading Lessig’s book, just like last time with Stewart Brand’s book!

Then came the upper, a pre-print of Diamandis & Kotler’s Abundance due to come out Feb 2012. This book is a compendium of many great books and speakers on the topic of techno-futurism.

I love his description of Craig Venter: “he has the appearance of a modern-day wizard — like Gandalf with a solid stock portfolio and a pair of flip-flops” (p.59)

They posit that we are entering an era of abundance driven by “the coming of age of the DIY innovator, a new breed of technophilanthropist, and the expanding creative/market power of the rising billion [from the base of the pyramid] —augmented by exponential technology. In fact, exponential technology could be viewed as their growth medium, a substrate both anchoring and nurturing the emergence of these forces.” (p.77)

“More than a trillion genetically engineered meals have been served and not a single case of GE-induced illness has turned up.” (p.103)

But overall, I would recommend Abundance if you want a synthesis by summary quotes of many great books on the subject by: Ray Kurzweil, Kevin Kelly, Matt Ridley (and more), Steven Johnson (and more), Stewart Brand, Stewart Kauffman, Geoffrey West, Neal Stephenson as well as great speakers and innovators: Nicholas Negroponte, Nathan Myhrvold, Bill Gates, Sal Khan, Richard Branson and Craig Venter.

57 responses to “Winter Reading”

  1. Will get "abundance" in spring… Diamandis grabbed my attention big time when I have heard his talk at Stanford entrepren. corner. He is a genius. Glad that Larry can write his books and he is not afraid for his life here… Yep, one force is pushing up and another is sliding down. Glass is half full no matter what.

  2. Glad I’m old, I don’t think I envy my kids and grandkids in 30 years – I REALLY hope I’m wrong..

  3. Heh, "cognitive speedball".

  4. What is really amazing. Being a kid with no money, not knowing anything about politics, but knowing that money is the greed "engine" that everyone fights for and learning this at such an early age. The very thing that tears down all of our love and devotion to one another, the very instinct that makes us "human". Yet, people get paid money for communicating how screwed up the system is. **SCOFFS**

    "Rather than love, than money, than faith, than fame, than fairness, give me truth."
    ~Thoreau

  5. Some people mentioned that they read the paper books faster than the Kindle version. If this is the case for you, we have a chance to slow you down once in a while.

  6. We were discussing this kind of absolute corruption of politics by wealth in terms of John Dewey’s prescient understanding. "As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance." The rhetoric of his time used big business as the proxy for almost all political corruption by wealth. He would no doubt be flabbergasted how this has now transferred into the private domains to individuals like the Koch brothers, globalized as sovereign wealth influences such as from mideast oil and institutionalized as the banking system. Combine that with trends like the rise of US idiocracy and what can one say? Dewey was just seeing the tip of a very bizarre iceberg. He was highly influential in shaping educational and social policy in China interestingly enough. Way ahead of anyone else in seeing the significance and need to have something akin to what they have been doing over the last 30 years. In this case the Chicago school philosophy is that Chinese sovereign influence is highly beneficial for the US. Literally, it is no accident both U of Chicago and Chicago Public Schools both have big Confucius institutes. I think a classic Chinese imperial political service mandatory educational testing model for the US would be a good thing.
    Rather than Taoist classics we would make it heavy on Math, Physics, Music and whatever else it takes to screen out people like Sara Palin and Anthony Wiener.
    http://www.chinaknowledge.de/History/Terms/hanlinyuan.html
    Somebody agrees with me at least: "Confucius and Famine
    The reason China missed the scientific and industrial revolutions is now well known: Its rigorous civil-service examinations, which emphasized the Four Books and Five Classics of Confucianism, left clever and ambitious people with little time for mathematics or scientific experiments, as Lin says." Nothing to do with religion that is certain, notwithstanding scholarship of Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, et. al.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-05/chinese-survive-canniba...

  7. Even if "Republic Lost" is all true, can we not do something? Sure, big corporations and special interest groups are buying congress and probably effectively choosing who gets to run for president. But we, the people, are NOT victims here. We are the ones giving these corporations the money that they use to corrupt our political system. If you don’t like what a corporation is doing, don’t buy their stuff. Don’t buy their stock either. I admit my portfolio is doing poorly, but I’m not invested in any petroleum, liquor, or arms products that I am aware of, not even through a mutual fund.

    We mostly buy food that’s grown the way we want it to be. When I choose a car I choose it based primarily on gas mileage. I enjoy shooting, but I do most of it with lead-free ammunition in a pellet gun.

    Then, of course, there is voting. Less than 2 out of every 3 eligible Americans votes in the presidential election, less in smaller elections. There may be doom and gloom in store for us, but a simple solution is for most people to spend a few hours a year educating themselves about issues and candidates, then get off the couch, go down to the local high school and cast a ballot. The person you vote for on the town council this year, runs for mayor in a few years, congress a few years later, and president after that. Find out who the little guys are because that’s where your vote counts the most, and also it plays a big role in determining the pool of candidates for the bigger offices.

    We can begin to reform the system any moment we choose, but most of us choose not to every single day in a thousand little ways. Instead of focusing on how bad and wrong everything is (and I concede that we have serious problems), there are things we can do, right now, to stop each of our individual roles in this decline and put ourselves and our country on the right track.

  8. Happen to be an economist by any chance? 🙂

    Nice theory but I don’t think it’s solving the problem in practice. Food in particular is a loaded example. I bet you eat a lot of ADM product, one of the worst offenders (Lessig summarizes that each billion that ADM makes on high fructose corn syrup costs consumers $10B and with corn ethanol, it’s -$30B per $B earned).

    Lessig’s point is that the ADMs of the world get the multi-billion dollar subsidies and earmarks and tax code changes completely independent of the voting process. It’s a gift economy among those with relationship capital.

  9. Oh, and don’t forget the military suppliers. Consumer boycotts don’t apply there.

  10. Right – consumer boycotts cannot solve all world problems…
    And about politics and our leaders… i still cannot get it how a person who would not be hired as a manager (low iQ and intellect is absent (Bush and Palin), severe mental problems (Putin), or severe abuse of alcohol (like Yeltsin) can be still a president and be responsible for the nuclear button. Where are the most basic filters and plain common sense in this case? When leader is incompetent, corruption blossoms.
    Technology could drive more transparency and thus less corruption… there is the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index by which all world is measured and most organizations used it while dealing with a specific country…I did not look at it for a while… I am sure the US is still better than Russia… but New Zealand looks like a paradise on earth in this regard… maybe there is something we all can learn from New Zealand… Social media can be a huge positive force as I can see now…Also US went a few decimal points down if it is all accurate.

  11. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] That includes hybrid military industrial ventures like NASA.

  12. What CAN we do to improve the situation? If consumer boycotts and voting are not effective, would you advocate armed revolt? The times I’ve given organizations money to advocate for certain things have been huge disappointments. Small but effective compromises mustn’t bring in as many donations as radical and fruitless posturing.

    I think consumer boycotts or at least changes in consumption can make a difference even for military suppliers. We make big military interventions in countries where we have big economic interests and small ones or none at all in countries where we don’t. If we all reduce our oil, diamond, and illegal drug demand, would not our military needs diminish as well (within limits)?

    I am depressed by the current state of affairs, but I haven’t totally lost faith in the system. There are some things we can’t do, but I try to do the things I can. I am guilty of a certain amount of burying my head in the sand. The reality of the situation is often too much for me to bear.

  13. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/trombamarina] If US history is any indication armed revolts are in fact the way to proceed when serious consumer boycotts like tea parties don’t work. They were much more imaginative with consumer boycotts in those days too. Guy Fawkes masks and ipods are so lame compared to anonymous Indian disguises, lots of drinking at ye olde colonial radical pubs & clubs, and the relief from repressive uptight puritan values with the subsequent compulsory debauchery.
    I like this court testimony which should be required reading for all frat boys:
    "We then quietly retired to our several places of residence, without having any conversation with each other, or taking any measures to discover who were our associates; nor do I recollect of our having had the knowledge of the name of a single individual concerned in that affair, except that of Leonard Pitt, the commander of my division, whom I have mentioned. There appeared to be an understanding that each individual should volunteer his services, keep his own secret, and risk the consequence for himself. No disorder took place during that transaction, and it was observed at that time that the stillest night ensued that Boston had enjoyed for many months. "
    The non-PC behavior in those times towards dissenters is notable as well:

    "The next day we nailed the skirt of his coat, which I had pulled off, to the whipping post in Charlestown, the place of his residence, with a label upon it, commemorative of the occasion which had thus subjected the proprietor to the popular indignation."

    Sounds like a very orderly affair. I forgot about ye olde whipping post and how people used to behave when real popular indignation surfaces.

  14. Sadly, Lessig would agree that an external intervention may be the most likely fix as the system can’t reform itself. But for those who want to induce chance, he suggests four remedies that each have <10% chance of working (in his estimation), from a curious play to run one candidate for many offices in the primaries, to candidates who have this as their only issue and pledge to resign from politics forever after change occurs, to the one I think he sees as the most likely, a Constitutional Convention called by the States (as external actors to the Federal system). All are unprecedented moves.

  15. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] These authors and everybody else needs to realize that the US is a republic and not a democracy. "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government" does not mean Newt and Sarah will be your overlords either. The word democracy is not mentioned even once in the constitution and many founders scoffed at the concept of democracy that most Americans seem to think is good government. The entire structure of central legislative bodies is really an anachronism from the days of difficult communications and transportation. It has also become something of a moral as well as a physical hazard. Location of all the idiots and scoundrels in central locations is no doubt beneficial in some cases. The round up the lawyers problem becomes much more straightforward for example.
    Regardless, for interventions 911 is the biggest recent one, with all negative impacts and reforms the way I view it. That is in contrast to what a Chris Hitchens wrote about 911 being a positive event, alerting us dramatically to the reality of Islamofascism and terror, who could have foreseen it after all, Iraq was the correct war to fight even if we knew with certain hindsight no WMDs(!), I am still right ad nauseam. The other intervention, which I rank as all positive, contrary to 911 is the the pure technology information impact of things like Google, Iphones, internet access, etc. Much harder to hide lies, corrupt practices, idiocy, and more with all that tech transparency.

  16. Also look at this map: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/...

    US definitely has room for improvement even in comparison with Canada (as this is as of 2010).
    Together with France with Great Britain, not even mention Russia or other parts of former Soviet Union… although a part of Russian corruption is in Londongrad, so not sure if it is very accurate… and moreover, things are not getting better globally, they are getting worse… technology can save us here…

  17. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] The fee based versions of that corruption index map is like what Dow Jones was trying to sell to us: http://www.dowjones.com/riskandcompliance/index.asp?sect=compliance
    Which is ok for doing things like specific risk counterparty work or more like just having it to show for something of due diligence at compliance BS showtime. Better is if you get someone like me to give you a value at risk number for show of due diligence on say Mexican sugar warehouses via a Latin America commodity finance group deals. Mexican sugar, wink wink. We can’t afford to store it senor, reeesky stinkin warehouses.
    Yeah, it is corruption free and really profitable. What is also good, and needed in a place like Brazil is supply chain and bid corruption shennanigans due diligence. You think you are being competitive but it is all ultimately controlled by one point in or out of the government. That is fun.

  18. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jgury] [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] My comment about armed revolt was meant as a rhetorical question, not a proposition. Moral implications aside, if we remove the legislative branch of government, someone has to replace them with something better. The corporate interests who control them now are in the best position to replace them for us.

    If we remove a corporate interest like ADM, but keep drinking soda, other corporations will fill the gap and meet our demand for corn syrup. But if enough people stop consuming artificial sweeteners, ADM will find less profit in making corn syrup and go out of business or switch to making something else and they will start asking the government to subsidize that instead. How could our system work any better than that?

    I see us like the mythical Midas who gets what he asks for and then doesn’t like it. The solution is to be more careful about what we ask for. The safest thing I know to ask for is Joy. When I get more specific than that, I usually get into trouble.

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] Technology can save us? Maybe. But technology is likely to give us even more of what we ask for. We have to be even more careful about what our actions create for us.

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] Ha ha. I’m a programmer and system designer, not an economist. Maybe I chose the wrong vocation.

    When we recently told Iran that we wouldn’t buy their oil, they threatened war. Clearly economic forces can influence military spending, it’s just more complicated.

    I agree that a Constitutional Convention is his best (his only remotely plausible) idea. Having lived in SC and MA, I suspect such a convention is more likely to bring about (or rekindle) a cival war than solve any of the problems we are currently talking about.

    You are a fine example of our system working. You seem to be in a unique position of influence and to be uniquely well-suited to use that position for good.

    Conculsion:
    Even if we achieve all the changes we hope for, we still need to be responsible about our individual consumption, production, spending, investing, voting, hiring, and choice of vocation and employer if we want to keep the gains we’ve made. I guess I just think that same responsibility is at least as likely to bring about the desired changes as any of the other options on the table.

    No processed sweeteners, alcahol, tobacco, firearms, illicit drugs, or pirated or proprietary software (besides Flickr) were used in the making of this post. Cheers.

  19. I agree with this one too… Hate junk food, sodas, drugs and other evils anyways. However, world elite has greater decision making power… History is one of those paradoxes – do things really change?

  20. The book is a perceptual prism that once installed, makes sense of the formerly incomprehensible world of Washington. So the tap root can be seen more clearly now. It was all such a mystery before, leading to cynicism and withdrawal.

  21. Corn syrup is not as egregious an example as corn ethanol in corruption, stupidity, bad policy, bad science, scientists behaving as special interest prostitutes, something that you can’t boycott, and more. One thing going on that your books might not be aware of, despite all their political perceptual prismatic brilliant insights, is in the realms of exclusive information access for all the pay for elites of gov and law getting hit on by the better financial and business marketdata and news services. TED authors don’t typically get in fights to the death, big adventures and happy marriages with the Bloombergs and Reuters of the world but I sure do – and I am not dead. That is, information that was confined to DC and legal elite types is now getting out to business and econ elite types and to info elite types in general if they can pay for it. BGOV, BLAW in compu system terms or IKON if you are working in scientific academic publications, patent trolling, submarining and whatever other virtual legal skulduggery they engage in. Nathan Myhrvold lectures and informs us all on the real economic values of innovation in public policy. If you want to buy that direct feed, hey, it is a big brave new DC world, maybe he is speaking in code, then you better read it.

  22. also back to food and corporations – i found this very recently: http://www.farmfreshtoyou.com/index.php
    tried it couple times and the vegies do taste like they were picked up from your own garden today… it is very different from the ones at Wallmart. You just pay $30-40 and get a box near your door once a week, two or once a months whichever you want. Thus, i will continue with the service and liked their business model so far, hope they will grow… there are probably others, similar in other states. I would love if they would offer more variety though…
    When people do really starve in Africa, they do not have a choice and in these sad circumstances (like in blockaded Leningrad) – any food will do…just to keep one alive… but since California is not anything but – people can choose more healthy and just more tasty options… thus it is a matter of choice. And who wants to eat apples from Wallmart? – they do not even taste like apples. I still remember trying one for the very first time… could not even understand what i was eating.

  23. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] There is a famous Stanford perceptual prism experiment in age effects on learning using owls fyi. Owls learn complex night and day navigation skills using visual coordination with sound. Young owls learning adjusted faster to strong prisms more quickly compared to older owls. Older owls were able to get to the same performance level it just took them longer with less potent perceptual prisms in place. http://www.pnas.org/content/97/22/11815.figures-only
    news.stanford.edu/news/2005/january12/med-owl-0112.html
    This is what real neuroscientists do. As opposed to publishing pop polemics about ending faith and getting zonked on the latest Dr. Timmy lab goodies.

  24. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] You would like Farmer John’s place down the road from me.
    web.me.com/angelicorganics/Angelic_Organics___Chicago_CSA… He runs an interesting operation in CSA Ag to say the least. The film they did with him is worth watching. I forget but Peter Coyote was running around up here doing a documentary interview with him that was pretty good too.
    http://www.linktv.org/programs/foodrev
    I got my hands so full here that I could not even do the open house/barn for members there when my city friends want some rural airtime.
    I am getting bad news via Brazil on climate with extreme rain pattern trend and shift. This season the disaster zone shifted about 150 km norheast in RJ state and Minas Gerias. They may sound unfamiliar but these Brazil state zones are big diverse agriculture areas even compared to the US heartland. We keep hammering on the gov there at every level to get more serious about basic civil defense, infrastructure rules, etc. to deal with this reality rather than keep being in denial and putting more effort into world cup and Olympic planning.

  25. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06] 1/3 is more than a passing grade on open internet communications. Sometimes I get really bizarre misunderstanding responses from any number of confusion zones. Zones like people who read only text fragments on small screen wireless devices, people who speak English as foreign language, people who are functionally illiterate, insane, paranoid, or cannot handle any counter examples to core unexamined values. It is not my fault if someone’s self image of intelligence is sadly mistaken for whatever reason. In particular when they are dishing out public BS they typically can’t take it when they get called out on it. Much like the reactions in debates with and among street lunatics. Not to disparage street lunatics, most of them have much better manners and clarity than many people on the web.

  26. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06] Thread pollution is one of those things always at the control of the threadmaster to identify and turn into trash. This is not a ticker tape parade where the honorees have no choice but to smile and wave while trash rains down in jubilation. Lets see, thread topic is political reform, a happy future, economics, how to reprogram corruption behaviors, and more.

  27. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06] Why don’t you use Wiki to create your memoirs, autobiography, hagiography, delusions of grandeur, and make outrageous claims like you invented the question mark? Then you can see who chooses to engage in trolling edit thread warfare and pollution. Much like the wiki entry for Mother Teresa.

    hagiography /harəfi/ n. [mass noun] the writing of the lives of saints. – [count noun] a biography that treats its subject with undue reverence.

    Stevenson, Angus (2010-07-23). Oxford Dictionary of English (Kindle Locations 174593-174599). Oxford University Press.

  28. Christopher Hitchens never studied programming but he certainly would have recognized highly accurate irreverential proximity in the previous example.

  29. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06] Hey, but seriously you open up the dictionary for hagiography, up pops Mother Teresa. Nobody gets what you’re talking about except maybe if Richard Dawkins is out there watching-even he has to think a little bit. He can’t laugh openly because he has sexism issues to deal with from elevatorgate, Chris Hitchens is dead and Sam Harris wants to kill you. Your salvation? Smart Catholic men, closet atheist sexist pigs with no sensitivity whatsoever to the hostility of gender based image ridicule. Mother Teresa gets a hagiography but father Mikey, the closet atheist, is forced to perform real bingo miracles every Friday night. It is an unfair world and I am here to tell you.

  30. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] That’s fantastic! Thanks for sharing. Eating what is in season locally does limit variety compared to the grocery store. Animal, Vegetable, Miracle is a well written, funny, and inspiring book on eating local food that my wife and I both really enjoyed.

  31. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/66353259@N00] thank you – it is a great book indeed and love the idea:):)

  32. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06] Some days he becomes confused and thinks he is Ishikawa Jozan , then starts speaking Japanese poetry: "Years ago I retired to rest, did some modest building in this crinkle of the mountain. Here in the woods no noise, no trash; in front of my eaves a stream of pure water. In the past I hoped to profit by opening books; now I’m used to playing games in the dirt. What is there that’s not a children’s pastime? Confucius, Lao-Tzu-a handful of sand….I have tasted every pleasure of mist and sunset in these ten years short of a hundred." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGwXM2TeKh0&feature=related
    In the Brazil mountains there is bamboo, pure water, but no deer. However, we built a 鹿威し the size of a large canon. We have never seen any aliens there yet but we do have an astral projection visit every now and then: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jgury/4042691601/]

  33. Back on topic for just a sec… in a strange turn of irony, Nancy Pelosi wants to meet tomorrow. Should I ask her to sign Lessig’s book?

  34. Would be cool:) more recent corruption perception index map: cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/results/
    interesting that UK has higher number than US, although most of corrupt Russian money is in UK (like billions if not trillions by now)…and talk about UK politicians and corruption… hm, ok, got it – it is all about perceptions. Africa looks rather scary, except Botswana; Chile and Uruguay are less corrupt than the rest of LA. Finland, Denmark and New Zealand are ahead of the game globally – we can all learn from them.

  35. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] Yes especially if her photo is in it. Make sure to hold the book right so you get a nice clear covershot just to make it easy for comedy PS work. Don’t forget to bring as many unsigned Visa cards as you can get her to autograph along with a few of those big joke scissors for a hilarious mug opportunity like you are declining her credit card with her trying to buy the book from you. If Larry is there he can mug along as an impatient guy in line behind her or play the role of a grumpy Republican getting similar treatment while she waits in line picking his pocket.

    Is that a switchblade that Barney Frank is showing Nancy Pelosi? I can’t imagine her having one. SJ should ask her about that.

  36. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/44124348109@N01]
    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/66353259@N00]
    this quote seems still true – thousands of years did not change anything here at all:
    "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." – Aesop
    I am not talking about Nancy or any other specific American politician.
    The only thing is that we live in a global world now and corruption is a major global problem.
    It is not my passion to fight global corruption though… but it is a kind of another "elephant in the room" which is hard to miss in our days (especially when it comes to my homeland). Technology does enable new ways of doing old things; hope we will see a better world map someday. But this is a very difficult job for large groups of people, not for one superhero.
    Again, interesting how Finland ended up ahead of the game here… what is it in Finnish culture that made it possible?

  37. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] You would need to study things like progressive parking policy if this interesting corruption study is any indication:

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w12312

    ". Taken together, factors other than legal enforcement appear to be important determinants of corruption."
    http://www.nber.org/papers/w12312.pdf

  38. interesting, thank you:) it is hard to understand where is the chicken and where is the egg in this case, exactly… culture… i wrote one paper about Russia as a part of my grad degree and arrived to a conclusion that the change of ideological paradigm (from capitalism to communism and back) is in fact did not change anything when it comes to corruption and bureaucracy in my homeland (there was once a writer – Saltykov-Tshedrin 19th century – you can read him today just fine, like it was written today) – moreover, when during some recent historical transitions the state itself got weaker – corruption blossomed even more… it is probably true about many other places in the world… thus weaker state is not a solution to the problem. Even which “ism” it is seems in fact less relevant in comparison with this major global cancer-like illness. Culture is one of the main factors…right? changing culture… possible for one person (if there is a desire to change and to learn) and hard one for a nation…
    Ok, leaving… do not want to think about it anymore – there are probably people who are more qualified working on this problem without me. Not my call.

  39. "Republic, lost" sounds like a really good book I may have to read.

    Zooming way out, I can see that Congress has two main purposes.
    1 – Spend the trillions of dollars.
    2 – Figure out who will pay those dollars.

    If money corrupts, then that huge budget must be overpowering. I hope there are smart people smart enough to know how to fix our system and also smart enough to know how to get us to actually do what is required. After two or three wins, the ball should really get rolling.

    We need a list of goals and a path to get there. For instance, healthcare; lets let the government compete with private enterprise. If the government is as bad as right wingers say, it will fail due to inefficiencies. If the government is in fact far more efficient (like Medicare is) it will grow to swallow the entire market. The massive profits and extremely poor benefits the current insurance industry produces will not be able to compete.

    Then we can work on a flat tax with absolutely no exemptions. It’s the only fair thing to do.

    Lobbying should be a crime, just as bribery is.

  40. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/belleville] 0.5 – Steal the dollars – even if you are extremely wealthy.
    The other things to consider are the beyond money perk appeals of pure power and privilege. Bill Gates can’t get O’hare airport shut down for his visit if he feels like it, not to mention all that other big power stuff that private money can’t fully command like military bases, a/c carriers, etc. They can sure influence it but not command it outright, not yet at least. That used to be true of things like prisons and police have always been problematic.
    By the way, digressing on the P alliterations in this thread, there is a good Kathy Bates/Holly Hunter ‘chick flick’ (‘that is not me using that term or that I would say it’) "Little Black Book" where a major theme is alliteration. Everything written on the show is an alliteration on K for the TV character named Kippy. Kathy Bates can pull just about anything out of the crapper.
    Anyway, power is often more corrupting than the money. Many stay in office in lieu of getting much bigger private sector paydays, perks and all other monetary Ps. You have to ask, what are the true sources of their power? In the case of the executive branch, the POTUS, those are pretty clear examples to identify, on the surface at least. In the legislative and judicial branches it is different. You need to identify weakest power links for whatever kind of ball rolling, ball uhh, game you want to start. Who is most stupid, most powerless, vulnerable, chatty, vain, etc. That is where being a maestro of new tech really helps. In general they don’t understand tech, are fearful of it and becoming ever more pitifully dependent on those who control it. The good news? Knowledge is still power. Even if you really don’t want to know or have to fake being stupid to save yourself from the ignorant, the superstitious, the church, the man, etc.

  41. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] " Technology does enable new ways of doing old things"
    Yes, and I like the enabling power in really knowing some old ways so they can become new things with technology. The advantages of experience, age, and wisdom. When old stuff winds up transforming into something new via technology that process is certainly facilitated by having someone around who does know the really valuable old stuff. That covers everything from wheel reinvention to aviation, arts, war, and just about everything except teen romance. Not to discount the value of teen romance. I heard it was not only alot of fun but that life was not worth living without it.

  42. I did not talk about teen romance or any romance here:) and my thoughts are on different topics right now… and light years away from any teen romance:D
    Agree about old staff, i personally do not discount "old staff" … one of my own degrees was in history anyway and the only major thing i have learned from it that history keeps to be rewritten. Ok, leaving this discussion string for now:)

  43. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/solerena] But teen romance has so many excellent examples of your statement: "Technology does enable new ways of doing old things"
    I’m sure there are global experts who do nothing but figure out how to make vast fortunes by enabling this with technology. Here I am contemplating Nancy Pelosi and Mother Teresa now that Chris Hitchens is gone, and the need to use aliases. while the rest of the world works on new android hook up algorithms. Sounds about right.

  44. I just watched this very informative documentary on the market crash. With an average of a million dollars per year given to, or spent lobbying each individual congrescritter by the financial services industry, our government is bought and paid for. I suppose the investment banks that make markets in IPOs are all tainted.

    That’s just one industry. I remember the news of the governmental agency in charge of regulation our oil resources was also knee deep in cocaine, hookers and lobbyists. Makes me wonder if this is the norm or whether there is a significant number of businessmen and politicians not living this life. At least Pelosi wasn’t mentioned in the video, but Reagan, Bush, Clinton, W and Obama were listed as contributors to the meltdown.

  45. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/belleville] See if this pps document link works so you can get a different view of what went on with subprime lending. docs.google.com/open?id=1Ai_-_Q0_mmALhDfrJ3xrNAzUWwjQBUp4…
    The Enron documentary is another one that I highly recommend. I had many colleagues who went to work there in that heyday. Alot of the systems and software they put together is still valid and we do in fact see it resurface in various different forms in energy trading sans stripper/ hookers, coke and lobbyists. That all falls under the "who got what was in Jeff Skillings office" problem in energy finance and economics. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1016268/

  46. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/27817825@N07] You’re leaving a critical part out of the pps. The very same investment banks that were selling the steaming heaps were buying huge amounts of insurance against them, betting they were going to fail. Oh, and paying themselves huge bonuses on profits that didn’t pan out.

  47. and the media company SOPA opera is playing today… From Lessig’s book:

    copyright spending Lessig

  48. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/belleville] That is what the CDOs are in the presentation.

  49. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/27817825@N07] I was referring to the credit default swaps against those CDOs, the derivatives AIG was selling to very people selling the CDOs as well as to the hedge funds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *