Canon PowerShot S90
ƒ/2
6 mm
1/60
500

I remember Steve Austin as the Six Million Dollar Man growing up. But it didn’t always go by the script.

This wreckage is from the November 1967 crash of the X-15A-3 rocket plane that killed pilot Michael Adams and ended the X-15 program. It still bears pencil marks on its inner face from the construction. And it has rows of flat-head screws.

Fellow pilot Bill Dana signed the face in silver ink. Dana flew this particular X-15 sixteen times prior, and became Chief of NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) in Edwards, California.

This artifact is a counterpoint in the collection to the highlight of the X-15 program, the fastest windshield on Earth, which Pete Knight flew to Mach 6.7 a month earlier.

A description of that fateful day:
At 10:30 a.m., the X-15-3 dropped away from its B-52 mother ship at 45,000 feet near Delamar Dry Lake. At the controls was veteran Air Force test pilot, Major Michael Adams. Starting his climb under full rocket thrust, he was soon passing through 85,000 feet. Then an electrical disturbance distracted him and slightly degraded the control of the aircraft. Having adequate backup controls, Adams continued on. At 10:33 he reached a peak altitude of 266,000 feet (becoming America’s 27th astronaut). In the DFRC flight control room, mission controller Pete Knight monitored the mission with a team of engineers. Something was amiss. As the X-15 climbed, Adams started a planned wing-rocking maneuver so an on-board camera could scan the horizon. The wing rocking quickly became excessive, by a factor of two or three. At 230,000 feet, encountering rapidly increasing dynamic pressures, the X-15 entered a Mach 5 spin.

At 10:34 came a shattering call: ”I’m in a spin, Pete.” A mission monitor called out that Adams had, indeed, lost control of the plane. A NASA test pilot said quietly, ”That boy’s in trouble.” Plagued by lack of heading information, the control room staff saw only large and very slow pitching and rolling motions. One reaction was ”disbelief; the feeling that possibly he was overstating the case.” But Adams again called out, ”I’m in a spin.” As best they could, the ground controllers sought to get the X-15 straightened out. They knew they had only seconds left. There was no recommended spin recovery technique for the plane, and engineers knew nothing about the X-15’s supersonic spin tendencies.

Adams held the X-15’s controls against the spin, using both the aerodynamic control surfaces and the reaction controls. Through some combination of pilot technique and basic aerodynamic stability, the plane recovered from the spin at 118,000 feet and went into a Mach 4.7 dive, inverted, at a dive angle between 40 and 45 degrees.

But then came a technical problem that spelled the end. The Honeywell adaptive flight control system began a limit-cycle oscillation just as the plane came out of the spin, preventing the system’s gain changer from reducing pitch as dynamic pressure increased. The X-15 began a rapid pitching motion of increasing severity, with dynamic pressure increasing intolerably

As the X-15 neared 65,000 feet, it was speeding downward at Mach 3.93 and experiencing over 15 g vertically and 8 g laterally. It broke up into many pieces amid loud sonic rumblings, striking northeast of Johannesburg. Two hunters heard the noise and saw the forward fuselage, the largest section, tumbling over a hill.

25 responses to “She’s breaking up! She’s breakin—”

  1. photos from other angles showing the inner structures:

    IMG_5971

    IMG_6030

    Bill Dana with X15A-3
    ECN-1716

    The final reentry
    x15rentry

  2. sounds very sad, dramas are a part of life but who likes them.

  3. Where are you getting all these artifacts?

  4. Each of your artifacts have such interesting stories. A lot of the interestingness comes from the way you tell them.

  5. @belleville Well put. Better said than the way I asked. 🙂

  6. interesting that the human brain is always overruled by automatic control systems.
    like on AF447.
    this prevents experienced pilots from getting out of a crisis.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/scleroplex/5786716231/

    the human brain is always highly underrated and deliberately ignored.

  7. That whole "going to space in an airplane" story is pretty amazing.
    It seems (perhaps in hind site) no one has tried it since.
    Very brave set of pilots.

  8. @scleroplex – reminds me of Neil Armstrong on Gemini 8, when one of the thrusters in the Orbit Attitude and Maneuvering System (OAMS) was stuck on, sending them into a violent roll (a full revolution per second). Neil shut down the OAMS, and brought the spacecraft under control manually using the RCS system (center motor here).

    @belleville – thanks. And thanks to these interwebs to allow it to be shared more broadly than before. There are a remarkable number of significant artifacts scattered around (in this case, quite literally) and I think there is a bit of a public duty for proper curation and sharing. For example, I have come across the Apollo 11 LM-5 Eagle construction log by the Grumman engineers (day and night shifts). I am working on a high-quality scan of these hundreds of pages of handwritten notes to share them publicly for the first time.

    @kevlar – The sources vary. Some come directly from the astronauts (especially flown items that they kept from the missions; as they are hitting their 80’s, they are cleaning out the house). A space collector friend recalls that this particular piece was found by a "X-plane hunter" – someone who scours the site for debris. Portions of the horizontal and vertical stabilizers and a portion of an engine access panel were found as recently as 1992. While the site has been scoured clean, hunter rumor is that the left wing was never found.

    P.S. The X-15 design was the inspiration for the black winged rocket that I flew for my Level 3 Certification.

  9. Looking the wreckage more closely, I notice that the outer black metal has been machined for precise sinking of the conical screw heads so the outer surface is flush. The internal ribs have rows of rivets, each embossed with the underlined number 91.

    Here’s a NASA diagram of the innards:
    x2

  10. Musk is talking about electric plane here (could talk anyways), so it could be something like a rocket plane in the nearest future?:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwT3Y0lkYaQ&feature=related

  11. Are you sure those are Philips head? Aerospace companies in the 1950s toyed with all sorts of experimental fasteners. Those look to me like Mortorqs, but there were bunch of them like Torqset and Frearson. Mortorqs were popular because the were very shallow, so used less material and weighed less. Can you get an extreme closeup of the fastener head?

  12. I had not heard of these different types. I can on Monday – a close up of the X on the head of the screw…

  13. So who made the money off the purchase of this publicly owned piece of A/C? I would like my share back now, I need it!

  14. I hope that’s not how you think. Buck up. There can be only one.

  15. I was close. It’s a Torqset. These have to be used with a torque wrench because they don’t cam out like a Phillips head. But I think someone used too much torque on this one. Thanks for the closeup!

  16. Whats the difference please? http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-020503a.html
    "November 11, 2003 — Michael Pankiewicz, a former a quality assurance specialist at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, was sentenced Monday after having plead guilty to a misdemeanor count of theft of government property earlier this year, reports the Associated Press:
    Pankiewicz, 44, was ordered to serve one year probation and pay a $2000 fine for the theft of a 3-inch piece of Columbia debris.
    In addition to the debris, federal agents found in his possession 15 shuttle tiles, more than 100 ceramic plugs, several large blocks of unfinished ceramic material, 18 "Flown Hardware" tags and a number of small items taken from NASA, including batteries, rubber gloves and nylon line.
    Pankiewicz claimed the items were given to him after they were slated to be destroyed or abandoned. Authorities decided not to prosecute him for the items because they couldn’t prove that they were taken illegally."

    A man died in the A/C that you have a piece of. A man has also profited in the form of currency from a piece of said A/C. I just don’t get it! I have been following you for a long time Mr. Jurvetson, this matter is rather disturbing and is not in your nature as I have seen it from the past. Please message me so we can continue this discussion. Thank you. Ryan

  17. Oh my, it seems quite simple to me. As your link elaborates, the case there was theft. It just happened to be theft of space debris. (So, I hope you see the analogy to not condemning someone who buys a PC if other people have been arrested for stealing PCs).

    In the X-plane hunter sites I linked to above, you will see how these artifacts were found by people long after the crash (in 1992). If you Google aviation archaeology, you will see that it is quite common. And specifically for this vehicle: "The U.S. Air Force has no policies against the hobby, unless human remains or weaponry remain unrecovered at the site." (wikipedia). Neither was the case here since the government removed everything that it wanted from the site after the crash.

    Furthermore, I bought this item in a public auction. The auction house submitted information on the items for sale to NASA for pre-approval, and interestingly, only one item was retracted due to ambiguity (a training glove used by Neil Armstrong; NASA verbally OK’d it, but would not put it in writing, so they withdrew the item).

    Oh, and as to the "appropriateness", separate from the legality, consider that fellow pilot Bill Dana, who flew this very plane 16 times, signed his name boldly to the artifact. For him and me, it serves as a poignant reminder of the bravery of the test pilots that pioneered our space program. And I am thankful someone trod through miles of desert looking for stray pieces like this to preserve them for others to see. I hope to be a good curator of artifacts like this, sharing as much as I can learn about them online.

    (Ryan – hopefully that clears it all up. If not, please email me at SteveJ@Boxbe.com since I do not have your address to message you)

  18. There is a "black market" for art,cigarettes…you name it.
    And there is a legitimate one too.
    Its hard to imagine this pilots family taking offense at any of this…

    These guys enjoyed this unique program……the perks and the risks….as far as I understand it.
    If not they would have been in an office job.

  19. A memorial story on this flight in ParabolicArc

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *