Canon EOS 5D Mark II
ƒ/5
105 mm
1/200
3200

I moderated a panel on disruptive innovaton with, from right to left, Drew Endy of Stanford, Gen9 and IGEM (synthetic biology), Wendy Arienzo, CEO of Array Converter (pioneering a new technique for DC to AC conversion), and Danny Yu, CEO of Daintree Networks (ZigBee light bulbs).

Video is now up: of my talk and of the panel.

Drew works to make biology ever easier to engineer:
“Our work is a radical departure from the past generation (35 years) of biotechnology which has tended to be overdriven by applications, given that we typically turn to biology as a technology partner of last resort to solve pressing problems (cure this disease, give me a drop in fuel now, etc.). This has resulted in a collective and persistent underinvestment in tools supporting biotechnology. Most practice the details of genetic engineering today no different from how it was done in 1980.

Over the last 10 years we are pioneered the idea of standard biological parts and the use of abstraction for managing biological complexity. Biofab has produced the foundations of the world’s first “genome operating system” for E. coli. Basically, we have reduced the error rate of expressing genes in a bacterium by 6-fold (now at ~93.6% reliability). The impact of this advance is that the scale of the system that can be built (before a requirement to test what is happening) increases from 1 gene at a time to ~15 genes at a time. As we push this reliability higher, we eventually enable full forward engineering at the genome scale.

Ten years from now we should have made biology easy to engineer, sufficient to design (not just reconstruct) entire genomes. Everything now made in a plant can be made in yeast. Disruptions to material supply chains all over the place. Reduced energy and environmental loads, left and right.”

He gave the interesting energy-saving example of bio-engineered enzymes for detergents so we can now wash in a cold water cycle.

And for a recent example of computational design of de novo proteins, I mentioned David Baker’s groundbreaking work in designing proteins that target the invariant region of H1N1 and building novel catalytic enzymes (Science May 2011). He used 250,000 computers, but after a few turns of Moore’s Law, that will be commonplace.

(Panel press coverage at greentechmedia and Cnet)

19 responses to “Going Green Panel”

  1. It was a GREAT talk and panel. I knew that the biological engineering thing would take most of the attention, but what Wendy and Danny are doing is a marvel. So inspirational. Well, you know already what my feelings were as we made quite a chat of your facebook post with biotron.

    It was also nice to have it in audio only… "Video killed the radio star", and it’s getting boring… so "Let’s go back to the start"… Marconi and all that (re:wendy)… It’s now nice to see the picture after having listened to it.

    When you speak at a normal speed, it gets so -much more impressively- magnetic, you know. Please let us know the webcast things when you talk somewhere!

  2. You know some awesome people!

    I’ve just become aware of the DC to AC industry switchover. I was working on a sea floor core sampling drill. It has variable frequency drives (VDS) to spin up the hydraulic pumps. Before VFD’s motors needed a large current DC kick-start to get going which meant if they lost power on the sea floor they lost hydraulics until they could bring it to the surface and restart the motors (which particularly sucks if you have core barrels in the ground).

  3. very cool… i have just run into a thought today that Aristotle was the one who thought about DNA first (not quite DNA but his thought process was very close, kinda). Green+greek and very nice smiles here… on shoulder’s of giants was a nice metaphor:)

  4. Great panel on disruptive innovation. Read my thoughts about it here:
    felicitycarus.blogspot.com/2011/09/steve-jurvetson-and-in…

  5. thanks felicity. When you say "DFJ’s portfolio of companies that are changing the world reveal a curious lack of clean tech companies", perhaps you missed the portfolio slide near the beginning. And that’s just from our Menlo Park office. Globally, the DFJ Network has over 85 clean tech investments, perhaps more than any other venture firm on Earth.

  6. That’s a great transcript of a big lot of the talk! Thanks Felicity. I will send it to my client, he couldn’t listen to the webcast, he was in a dinner with Al Gore?! World is getting smaller… A pity it isn’t there that passage of Endy on the DIY turning to DIT (Do It Together), that was nice too.

    Steve, Felicity said: "But apart from a scattering of clean energy plays, DFJ hasn’t done a great deal to promote itself as a VC leader in the field since 2008 – perhaps as the economic crisis matured into the great recession." (*) You should work on more on promoting better what you are doing, so there is no misunderstanding or apparent disagreement between what’s said (promoted) and done. Do you want me to review your website and see if we can pimp it up a bit to improve promotion? |-)

    (*) great link to that interview, haven’t seen before: gigaom.com/cleantech/earth2tech-video-cleantech-investing…

  7. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06] V, the talk I talk about above is the webcast of this GoingGreen panel to where this picture comes from, guess it’s not online, it was a broadcast and steve put the link in facebook and I could see it in time.

    And the interview, this link gigaom.com/cleantech/earth2tech-video-cleantech-investing… there’s the interview at the bottom of the article, a video. You will like that one, too.

    And will help you with the directions, just in case… 😉

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson] J, is the talk of GoingGreen anywhere saved online?

  8. But we like plastic. And latex even more!

    P.S. Video is now up: of my talk and of the panel.

  9. Qué bueno!! Finally online with image and all!!

  10. The mic thing was great to break the ice, and now seeing it, most sure about it. Awesome.

  11. Reminds me of one great teacher Mrs. Green and her substitute was Mrs. Greener. 😀
    Green technologies are cool… impressed that you were here early too… together with SpaceX, quantum computing and all other things in your galaxy.
    Yes, the talk with the mic thing was sweet, and Estonians are very handsome – joining the chorus here. I will watch the panel later. Always fun to learn something new here.

  12. here – how ideas mate in our days:D:
    also a way to save the world… wish we could have green education, fast food and green politics:)
    vennetaj has already worked on this green cake:D

    [http://www.flickr.com/photos/24270806@N06/6211852171/in/photostream]

  13. Everyone just can’t be green enough and it gets confusing from a portfolio and index construct, track and filter perspective. All these claims: " An award was given to Generation Investment Management for Investor of the Year as the global investor with the largest percentage of its portfolio devoted to cleantech." But then " Globally, the DFJ Network has over 85 clean tech investments, perhaps more than any other venture firm on Earth." So this is an Al Gore type of Green investing vs. a DJF which strikes me as much more straightforward. I am away from the desk so I can’t check on what things like Green ETFs and funds are really out there, and don’t include US corn ethanol or carbon credit shell games.
    http://www.greenvc.org

  14. Thumbs up to the ecolaroid:

    SJ has quite the titter running thru the audience on that one.

  15. Meanwhile in the midwest we still like to grow real plants brdg-park.com/index.html

  16. Árpád Pusztai and Ignacio Chapela have two things in common. They are distinguished scientists and their careers are in ruins. Both scientists choose to look at the phenomenon of genetic engineering. Both made important discoveries. Both of them are suffering the fate of those who criticise the powerful vested interests that now dominate big business and scientific research. Statements made by scientists themselves prove that 95% of the research in the area of genetic engineering is paid by the industry. Only 5% of the research is independent. The big danger for freedom of science and our democracy is evident. Can the public – we all – still trust our scientists?

    http://www.scientistsunderattack.com/

  17. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/celtico] ". The big danger for freedom of science and our democracy is evident. Can the public – we all – still trust our scientists?" I think this needs a bit of editing: "Can any of us trust scientists?" is much better. Of course not. Some of us never have. Like we have never beaten our children, only different. Plus, of course it is not just the public who may not trust scientists Scientists as a group are noted for paranoid rivalry and distrust of one another to the point of madness so we don’t want to exclude them from the general public now do we? Finally "our scientists" is inherently biased. E.g. "OUR Nazi rocket scientists keep secrets better than YOUR Nazi rocket scientists." A nice example of Godwin’s law. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin’s_law

  18. Some of this denial logic has been great to foresee as propaganda. Myth of settled science is good one along with all facts must be consistent and big theory can always be destroyed by a single counterexample. One fossil Chihuahua destroys all evolutionary biology, then put up a quote from everyone’s favorite, unsourced bs Einstein. Tryanny of leftist scientists is a good one now too. They are advocating jail for climate denial! Which is interesting to see where denial really does get criminal negligence attached. Like this guy points out about seismology. Or if your MD decides smoking is really good for you, recommends more of it and goes on TV with that message.
    theconversation.com/is-misinformation-about-the-climate-c…

  19. Contradictory polemic from this quarter is to be expected ,as above.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *