Canon PowerShot S90
ƒ/2
6 mm
1/30
320

I just got back from the Churchill Club’s 13th Annual Top 10 Tech Trends Debate (site).

Curt Carlson, CEO of SRI, presented their trends from the podium, which are meant to be “provocative, plausible, debatable, and that it will be clear within the next 1-3 years whether or not they will actually become trends.”

Then the panelists debated them. Speaking is Aneesh Chopra, CTO of the U.S., and smirking to his left is Paul Saffo, and then Ajay Senkut from Clarium, then me.

Here are SRI’s 2011 Top 10 Tech Trends [and my votes]:

Trend 1. Age Before Beauty. Technology is designed for—and disproportionately used by—the young. But the young are getting fewer. The big market will be older people. The aging generation has grown up with, and is comfortable with, most technology—but not with today’s latest technology products. Technology product designers will discover the Baby Boomer’s technology comfort zone and will leverage it in the design of new devices. One example today is the Jitterbug cell phone with a large keypad for easy dialing and powerful speakers for clear sound. The trend is for Baby Boomers to dictate the technology products of the future.

[I voted YES, it’s an important and underserved market, but for tech products, they are not the early adopters. The key issue is age-inspired entrepreneurship. How can we get the entrepreneurial mind focused on this important market?]

Trend 2. The Doctor Is In. Some of our political leaders say that we have “the best medical care system in the world”. Think what it must be like in the rest of the world! There are many problems, but one is the high cost of delivering expert advice. With the development of practical virtual personal assistants, powered by artificial intelligence and pervasive low-cost sensors, “the doctor will be in”—online—for people around the world. Instead of the current Web paradigm: “fill out this form, and we’ll show you information about what might be ailing you”, this will be true diagnosis—supporting, and in some cases replacing—human medical practitioners. We were sending X-rays to India to be read; now India is connecting to doctors here for diagnosis in India. We see the idea in websites that now offer online videoconference interaction with a doctor. The next step is automation. The trend is toward complete automation: a combination of artificial intelligence, the Internet, and very low-cost medical instrumentation to provide high-quality diagnostics and advice—including answering patient questions—online to a worldwide audience.

[NO. Most doctor check-ups and diagnoses will still need to be conducted in-person (blood tests, physical exams, etc). Sensor technology can’t completely replace human medical practitioners in the near future. Once we have the physical interface (people for now), then the networking and AI capabilities can engage, bringing specialist reactions to locally collected data. The real near-term trend in point-of-care is the adoption of iPads/phones connected to cloud services like ePocrates and Athenahealth and soon EMRs.]

Trend 3. Made for Me. Manufacturing is undergoing a revolution. It is becoming technically and economically possible to create products that are unique to the specific needs of individuals. For example, a cell phone that has only the hardware you need to support the features you want—making it lighter, thinner, more efficient, much cheaper, and easier to use. This level of customization is being made possible by converging technical advances: new 3D printing technology is well documented, and networked micro-robotics is following. 3D printing now includes applications in jewelry, industrial design, and dentistry. While all of us may not be good product designers, we have different needs, and we know what we want. The trend is toward practical, one-off production of physical goods in widely distributed micro-factories: the ultimate customization of products. The trend is toward practical, one-off production of physical goods in widely distributed micro-factories: the ultimate customization of products.

[NO. Personalization is happening just fine at the software level. The UI skins and app code is changeable at zero incremental cost. Code permeates outward into the various vessels we build for it. The iPhone. Soon, the car (e.g. Tesla Sedan). Even the electrical circuits (when using an FPGA). This will extend naturally to biological code, with DNA synthesis costs plummeting (but that will likely stay centralized in BioFabs for the next 3 years. When it comes to building custom physical things, the cost and design challenges relegate it to prototyping, tinkering and hacks. Too many people have a difficult time in 3D content creation. The problem is the 2D interfaces of mouse and screen. Perhaps a multitouch interface to digital clay could help, where the polygons snap to fit after the form is molded by hand.]

Trend 4. Pay Me Now. Information about our personal behavior and characteristics is exploited regularly for commercial purposes, often returning little or no value to us, and sometimes without our knowledge. This knowledge is becoming a key asset and a major competitive advantage for the companies that gather it. Think of your supermarket club card. These knowledge-gatherers will need to get smarter and more aggressive in convincing us to share our information with them and not with their competitors. If TV advertisers could know who the viewers are, the value of the commercials would go up enormously. The trend is technology and business models based on attracting consumers to share large amounts of information exclusively with service providers.

[YES, but it’s nothing new. Amazon makes more on merchandising than product sales margin. And, certain companies are getting better and better at acquiring customer information and personalizing offerings specifically to these customers. RichRelevance provides this for ecommerce (driving 25% of all e-commerce on Black Friday). Across all those vendors, the average lift from personalizing the shopping experience: 15% increase in overall sales and 8% increase in long-term profitability. But, simply being explicit and transparent to the consumer about the source of the data can increase the effectiveness of targeted programs by up to 100% (e.g., saying “Because you bought this product and other consumers who bought it also bought this other product” yielded a 100% increase in product recommendation effectiveness in numerous A/B tests). Social graph is incredibly valuable as a marketing tool.]

Trend 5. Rosie, At Last. We’ve been waiting a long time for robots to live in and run our homes, like Rosie in the Jetsons’ household. It’s happening a little now: robots are finally starting to leave the manufacturing floor and enter people’s homes, offices, and highways. Robots can climb walls, fly, and run. We all know the Roomba for cleaning floors—and now there’s the Verro for your pool. Real-time vision and other sensors, and affordable precise manipulation, are enabling robots to assist in our care, drive our cars, and protect our homes and property. We need to broaden our view of robots and the forms they will take—think of a self-loading robot-compliant dishwasher or a self-protecting house. The trend is robots becoming embedded in our environments, and taking advantage of the cloud, to understand and fulfill our needs.

[NO. Not in 3 years. Wanting it badly does not make it so. But I just love that Google RoboCar. Robots are not leaving the factory floor – that’s where the opportunity for newer robots and even humanoid robots will begin. There is plenty of factory work still to be automated. Rodney Brooks of MIT thinks they can be cheaper than the cheapest outsourced labor. So the robots are coming, to the factory and the roads to start, and then the home.]

Trend 6. Social, Really. The rise of social networks is well documented, but they’re not really social networks. They’re a mix of friends, strangers, organizations, hucksters—it’s more like walking through a rowdy crowd in Times Square at night with a group of friends. There is a growing need for social networks that reflect the fundamental nature of human relationships: known identities, mutual trust, controlled levels of intimacy, and boundaries of shared information. The trend is the rise of true social networks, designed to maintain real, respectful relationships online.

[YES. The ambient intimacy of Facebook is leading to some startling statistics on fB evidence reuse by divorce lawyers (80%) and employment rejections (70%). There are differing approaches to solve this problem: Altly’s alternative networks with partioning and control, Jildy’s better filtering and auto-segmentation, and Path’s 50 friend limit.]

Trend 7. In-Your-Face Augmented Reality. With ever-cheaper computation and advances in computer vision technology, augmented reality is becoming practical, even in mobile devices. We will move beyond expensive telepresence environments and virtual reality games to fully immersive environments—in the office, on the factory floor, in medical care facilities, and in new entertainment venues. I once did an experiment where a person came into a room and sat down at a desk against a large, 3D, high-definition TV display. The projected image showed a room with a similar desk up against the screen. The person would put on 3D glasses, and then a projected person would enter and sit down at the other table. After talking for 5 to 10 minutes, the projected person would stand up and put their hand out. Most of the time, the first person would also stand up and put their hand into the screen—they had quickly adapted and forgotten that the other person was not in the room. Augmented reality will become indistinguishable from reality. The trend is an enchanted world— The trend is hyper-resolution augmented reality and hyper-accurate artificial people and objects that fundamentally enhance people’s experience of the world.

[NO, lenticular screens are too expensive and 3D glasses are a pain in the cortex. Augmented reality with iPhones is great, and pragmatic, but not a top 10 trend IMHO]

Trend 8. Engineering by Biologists.
Biologists and engineers are different kinds of people—unless they are working on synthetic biology. We know about genetically engineered foods and creatures, such as gold fish in multiple other colors. Next we’ll have biologically engineered circuits and devices. Evolution has created adaptive processing and system resiliency that is much more advanced than anything we’ve been able to design. We are learning how to tap into that natural expertise, designing devices using the mechanisms of biology. We have already seen simple biological circuits in the laboratory. The trend is practical, engineered artifacts, devices, and computers based on biology rather than just on silicon.

[YES, and NO because it was so badly mangled as a trend. For the next few years, these approaches will be used for fuels and chemicals and materials processing because they lend themselves to a 3D fluid medium. Then 2D self-assembling monolayers. And eventually chips , starting with memory and sensor arrays long before heterogeneous logic. And processes of biology will be an inspiration throughout (evolution, self-assembly, etc.). Having made predictions along these themes for about a decade now, the wording of this one frustrated me]

Trend 9. ‘Tis a Gift to be Simple. Cyber attacks are ever more frequent and effective. Most attacks exploit holes that are inevitable given the complexity of the software products we use every day. Cyber researchers really understand this. To avoid these vulnerabilities, some cyber researchers are beginning to use only simple infrastructure and applications that are throwbacks to the computing world of two decades ago. As simplicity is shown to be an effective approach for avoiding attack, it will become the guiding principle of software design. The trend is cyber defense through widespread adoption of simple, low-feature software for consumers and businesses.

[No. I understand the advantages of being open, and of heterogencity of code (to avoid monoculture collapse), but we have long ago left the domain of simple. Yes, Internet transport protocols won via simplicity. The presentation layer, not so much. If you want dumb pipes, you need smart edges, and smart edges can be hacked. Graham Spencer gave a great talk at SFI: the trend towards transport simplicity (e.g. dumb pipes) and “intelligence in the edges” led to mixing code and data, which in turn led to all kinds of XSS-like attacks. Drive-by downloading (enabled by XSS) is the most popular vehicle for delivering malware these days.]

Trend 10. Reverse Innovation. Mobile communication is proliferating at an astonishing rate in developing countries as price-points drop and wireless infrastructure improves. As developing countries leapfrog the need for physical infrastructure and brokers, using mobile apps to conduct micro-scale business and to improve quality of life, they are innovating new applications. The developing world is quickly becoming the largest market we’ve ever seen—for mobile computing and much more. The trend is for developing countries to turn around the flow of innovation: Silicon Valley will begin to learn more from them about innovative applications than they need to learn from us about the underlying technology.

[YES, globalization is a megatrend still in the making. The mobile markets are clearly China, India and Korea, with app layer innovation increasingly originating there. Not completely of course, but we have a lot to learn from the early-adopter economies.]

14 responses to “Churchill Club Top 10 Tech Trends Debate”

  1. We vote
    IMG_3942

    For trends 1-10, the panel votes were: (N=Red/No, Y=Green/Yes, M=Mixed Red/Green)

    Saffo: N, M, N, M, Y, Y, Y, Y, Y, Y
    Ajay : N, N, Y, M, Y, Y, N, N, N, N
    Steve: Y, N, N, Y, N, Y, N, M, N, Y (summary from notes above [ ])
    Aneesh: Y for everything (politically constrained perhaps) except trend 9 where he gave an M

    then we discuss a bit.

    Then the audience votes; this is the left half of the room holding up colored flags:
    IMG_3945

    Portion of audience agreement with trends 1-10, by electronic polling:
    44%, 40%, 46%, 69%, 60%, 80%, 58%, 51%, 29%, 71%

    So the audience agreed the most with trend 6 (social privacy) and the disagreed the most with trend 9 (simple code).

    and we have a few laughs as well
    IMG_3946

  2. Quite an interesting panel discussion. Thanks for posting the content of the debate as well as the images.

  3. #2 is very interesting…but many would argue that nothing replaces direct interaction (and physical examination) with a patient
    Sounds like a fascinating event.

  4. Steve I’m not quite sure I follow part of your response to #9:
    "If you want dumb pipes, you need smart edges, and smart edges can be hacked."
    If it is a given that smart edges can be hacked, why do we need them, from a security perspective?

  5. As one of your iAudience, I vote "Yes" for "Trend 1 Age Before Beauty".
    The Apple people certainly did a fantastic job to answer their parents’
    and grandparents’ need in technology. Shortly after iPad’s release, the AARP
    bulletined "Apple iPad Field Test: Does It Have Senior Appeal?" in its community.
    As the younger generation, we stereotypically think the new technology is for us.
    But there is always someone who thinks differently. In his novel "The Old Man and the Sea",
    Ernest Hemingway depicted a young Manolin who wanted to go fishing with the old
    Santiago even he has been forbidden by his parents to sail with the old man and
    been ordered to fish with more successful younger fishermen. Wisdom and insights
    are built up while one is aging.

  6. wonderful post as always… so sorry that i have to miss this event this year… will go next year and listen online… it is always interesting to hear the estimate in terms of timelines… trend can be major in a long term and not so obvious next year…

  7. Fascinating…

    on #9: I don’t know if simple = dumb, and I don’t think that going backwards is the answer either. Very often (especially in software) a simple, clean design can have the exact same functionality as a complex, grown, convoluted design, but with far less errors and flaws.

    What I do think should be done is to finally start using advanced programming languages and other tools which can avoid over 90% of all bugs and vulnerabilities by design (e.g. languages where buffer overruns basically can’t occur, which already eliminates a large number of attacks). (Of course some of these languages have been around for 20-30 years, and have been constantly revised – I would not say this is "going backwards", but rather that it is backwards not to use these tools).
    E.g. the language Ada is designed for high reliability systems – the structure and syntax of the language already avoids a lot of problems by being readable, orthogonal and strongly typed, and the compiler will catch a large number of stupid errors. If that is not enough there are add-ons like SPARK which enable automated formal verification of critical code. At the moment this is mostly used for aviation, traffic control, banking and space applications where errors can kill hundreds of people or create billion dollar losses – but I think it is about time to use a similar level of care for server software and other systems that are exposed to external attacks.

    on #2:
    "Some of our political leaders say that we have "the best medical care system in the world". Think what it must be like in the rest of the world! "
    – really? I guess some politicians say a lot of things… I am not that familiar with the US medical system, but from reading the news I didn’t have the impression it is the best in the world… ?

    on #3:
    I agree that rapid manufacturing will not displace regular manufacturing (and definitely not in 3 years), but I think there will be larger and larger niches where personalised products will appear. I don’t think this will be in the electronics market though, as this cannot compete with regular manufacturing – but I do think that there will be more and more physical/mechanical objects and gadgets that will be 3D printed with personalised features. However (and maybe your point), this is driven by software again – mass personalisation needs user-friendly software interfaces to let customers express what they want – CAD is still tricky stuff for few people.
    So I think in the short to medium term, there will be a number of product designers that offer personalisation features in their products, and the customer will use those to get the product they want. Probably, even if we had perfect modelling systems and virtual clay, most people would not really know what the product they want should look like – good design requires a lot of knowledge and creativity.

  8. One Tech Trend that is missing is artificial intelligence as exemplified by the Mentifex AI Mind in JavaScript that can now think visibly in English. Shameless plug, yes — but True AI is here, the rabbit died, and the cat is out of the bag.

  9. =)

    On the aging demographic trend #1, there was a funny moment when Saffo was arguing that good design trumps all, and no products need been designed with just the boomers in mind:

    Saffo: “Boomers will be as excited about phones with big buttons as toddlers are about training diapers.”

    “Or maybe it’s the other way around,” quipped Tony Perkins.

    I disagree with Saffo on this, but we did not have time to discuss further.

    I got the electronic voting data from the audience, split by gender and age. So I looked at trend 1. There was no difference by gender, but by age, there was a predictable difference in that the older cohort supported the trend (the majority of people over 60 years old agreed with the trend). Interesting tidbit: although the support percentage grew monotonically with age, there was one exception. People in their thirties were the most opposed to the trend, more so than people in their 20’s or 40’s. The peak of denial perhaps? =)

    Some other summaries of the evening: Forbes, Xconomy

  10. Steve, love the way you use Flickr … But if it goes away and we lose your excellent insights, that will be a bad day.

    Being a boomer (1956, just on the edge) with an innovative 16-year-old son, I like almost all of the comments around #1 … I think the dirty little secret of the iPad for boomers with poor eyesight, is pinching and enlarging the graphics so easily makes wearing glasses unnecessary. Our eyes are going as well as our ears, after cranking up rock and roll in our earbuds for too many years.

    Often wonder if Apple’s next big thing is walk-in clinics (ala The Apple Store) for boomers with hearing and sight problems where they fit you with trendy (pinchable focus) eyeglasses which also have embedded hearing devices.

  11. Probably many people got frustrated with facebook. I am one of them. As for LinkedIn goes: it is great (my own feelings). I have never had a single concern or any feeling of discomfort while using it. Not sure if other people did. It saves time and helps to network across many organizations and industries. I have found greatest people through LinkedIn and met some of them in person thereafter and joined a few very cool events in VC industry. I do not think LinkedIn should be combined with facebook as for violations of privacy. It is interesting for me to hear that most people in the audience and in the panel had also some resentment towards facebook.

    I am referring to the one of the summaries of the event below:
    "Social, Really: “The trend is the rise of true social networks, designed to maintain real, respectful relationships online.” Isn’t this Facebook and its clones. They all vote green. Saffo says this is absolutely right, that novelty is off the social networks, 3,000 friends is absurd. He thinks there will be vast reaction to world of Facebook and the like, where being disconnected will be in. It will be cool not to be on LinkedIn or Facebook. Aneesh says there will be trusted communications in sectors of the economy that needed it. Jurvetson says this problem has gotten so bad, “ambient intimacy,” he calls. He says people don’t need the piracy violations involved. (Self-violations, I think he means.) Royan says trend in social networks has been increased functionality; look at PayPal, essentially a trust early social network, he says that kind of thing is much easier to build around, real networks and identities we have. Room votes: a sea of green. Electronic score: 8.0."

  12. The quality of information that you are providing is simply marvelous.hearthstone gold

  13. Good blog along with the excellent quality stuff and I’m sure this will be greatly helpful.asus beyond virtual reality ready program

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *