I am fascinated by the details in the data. Red is acceleration, Green is velocity, Blue is altitude. Plotted over time; x-axis is seconds. I cropped the long tail of the fall back to Earth.

My Dizzy Bee rocket accelerated from 0 to Mach 1 in 2 seconds flat.

It took 37 seconds to coast to apogee, and then 5 minutes to tumble back to earth, with parachute deployment at 1000 ft. That was a nail-biter as it passed overhead at an average downward clip of 65 MPH and landed near our camp in the desert.

The HCX computer in the prototype avionics bay recorded 500 samples/second from the accelerometer and barometric pressure sensor. I’ll mark some interesting details in note overlays on the graph.

Independent of that flight computer was a GPS system in the same payload bay, which broadcast down at 1.5 second intervals. It is probably the most accurate, and it recorded the max altitude as 33,701 ft. MSL.

Big thanks to Rob Briody for lending me this developmental avionics package. I am totally hooked, and can’t wait to buy one. Gone is the wiring nest routing wires through bulkheads and to various computer connections, and unreliable screw switches, and the need to replace and secure the Duracells when they drop below 9.2V, and wondering about the jumper settings, and wondering if the GPS locked, and standing on a ladder next to a fueled rocket, futzing with screwdrivers (breaking screw switches, which I have done twice) and putting an ear on the rocket to listen for the beep sequence, and wondering where the rocket went, and what wind effects it saw while airborne. The rocket arming and feedback and telemetry feed all comes over the same radio with a 40 mile range. Now if it could also arm and control a videocamera and send sample frames down between GPS reads, I would be on cloud F9. =)

8 responses to “Mach 2 Flight Files”

  1. Sounds like you like the technology. I call it fire and forget. No more walstons and searching the heavens for your rocket and where it might be. Just get a nice cold drink, sit down with your laptop with everyone else, and enjoy the show. You can watch the whole flight right on your screen live.

    Just a note, but this technology development was made possible by a grant from the Mavericks Civilian Space Foundation to G-WIZ, in its effort to develop a better more reliable platform to support civilian space flight and STEM education. It is our hope that this technology developed by G-WIZ can not only make civilian space flight more probable, but also cheaper and safer.

  2. Oh yeah…..

    The video streaming? It is in the works, but requires a special C-band and or u-band radio.

    Maybe next years xmas list?

    We are just getting started…………….

    😉

  3. It’s a bit confusing. At first, the Baro altitude graph seems misaligned – 3 seconds in it’s going 800 miles an hour but hasn’t gained any altitude; the mach transition bump in the baro altitude doesn’t line up with mach 1 on the vertical speed line; and, the Pyro On flag on the baro line is displayed long after the pyro induced blip in the accelerometer data. The three second delay on the front could be explained by a slow baro port, I think. This maybe even explains why the mach transition baro blip is so wide and rounded? And the difference at deployment could be because the backup (?) fired first?

    Any way you look at it, it was an awesome flight.

  4. There is a note overlayed above about the baro sensor misreadings at Mach. The pyro flag at 4.7 sec is for staging (not used here). The pyro post deployment could be just as you mention. Perhaps the redundant LCX beat this HCX to the punch.

  5. For video streaming, what is commonly done now in the FPV (first person view) model airplane community is to use a digital HD camera to record on-board, which has an analog video out as well, and transmit the live video output via a 5.8 Ghz analog video link (or 900Mhz, or 2.4 GHz). The GoPro HD has now a firmware update that enables live AV out while recording (was possible before but required fiddling), but other cameras might do the same as well.
    I am using the airwave 5.8 Ghz transmitter and receiver modules from DPCAV.com (they also carry various other useful video gear). The 100mW transmitter is good for maybe up to one kilometre with dipole or moderately directional patch antennas (+5dbi), but with a narrow-beam patch or dish antenna multiple km should be achievable in line-of-sight. If legal in the US, you could also go for 1000mW transmitters which will easily have multi-km range.
    EagleTree sells data loggers with video on screen display, overlaying live airspeed, altitude, GPS, battery charge, etc… The telemetry is also transmitted digitally through the video link. In conjunction with the EagleEyes base station, the GPS data can be used to operate a pan-tilt antenna tracker, which gives better reception with directional high-gain antennas. It also has built-in diversity switching between two independent receivers for more reliability.
    Of course some of this stuff is pretty specific to model airplanes, and the antenna tracker most likely won’t keep up with rockets, but some of this may be useful. With multiple diversity switchers one could have 3-4 directional antennas to get enough coverage of the flight path.

  6. Love the data – tells true picture of the event. Even more amazing if this fast puppy shot 5 miles straight up and landed only feet from the launch point!

  7. I’m not sure which I love more: the rocket-launch video, the graph, or the fascinating comments above. Thanks for the vicarious rocketry!

Leave a Reply to jurvetson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *