Canon EOS 5D Mark II
ƒ/18
16 mm
1/10
100

I experimented with a mid-length exposure here, as it was a blend of day and night shots.

OK, ok, enough about rockets.

I need to head out and try to think like a techonomist.

When we consider the combinatorial explosion of possibly interacting ideas as the fountainhead of innovation, it not only creates the economy and explains accelerating change, it also subsumes biological evolution (raising the primary vector of progress to a higher level of abstraction) and nurtures a rational optimism for the future.

(blending Adam Smith, Matt Ridley, Richard Dawkins, Ray Kurzweil & Brian Arthur)

And stitched together by some fine dinner conversation with Matt Ridley (just before his TED Talk):

“Self-sufficient is another way of saying impoverished.”

“Innovation = ideas having sex.”

“There is literally nobody on the planet who knows how to make a computer mouse.”

9 responses to “Dusk on the Playa”

  1. Will there be videos of the Techonomy Conference posted (a la TED) on-line?

    (I had to add the word techonomy to my spellchecker.)

  2. Interesting picture, with gravity, pulls one in:)

  3. Conway had a good point at a TechCrunch conference the other day when he noted that the old supposed timeline was that you get a new Google type company once every ten years, and that in fact it was Google > Facebook = 4 or 5 years; Facebook > Twitter = 2 or 3 years; Twitter > Foursquare & Co. = 1 or 2 years. And of course that’s leaving out a massive number of companies such as Zynga or Tesla or Groupon or LinkedIn and on and on. Groupon by itself based on its supposed profit levels is already a $3 billion valuation ecommerce juggernaut.

    The explosion the last few years is a solid proof of the concepts of innovation by ideas having sex. As Facebook is responsible for Zynga (directly) and Groupon (distribution) and a million others. Or how the iPhone is exploding a new software industry (and now Android too of course). Or how Twitter has inspired TwitPic and sites like Dailybooth. And then another layer on top is the way the social networks are distributing new media like Mashable or Huffington Post or TechCrunch et al.

    If Facebook existed in a vacuum (self sustaining solitary platform with no extensibility), and didn’t allow the like button or games or content distribution properly among friends, we’d all be the poorer for it. Not to mention most likely Facebook wouldn’t exist accordingly (MySpace rules the universe? har har).

  4. sol – I felt that too.

    P.S. flickr – I see the new format rolled out today, and it reminds me of the attempt to make similar changes in 2006, and I helped persuade Stewart not to remove the set thumbnails in the right column for opportunistic discovery. The argument to remove them was that they confused some people and they are a server load (lots of lookups for heavily set-assigned folks like me). Alas, they are now gone. The loss is the juxtaposition that some people (like me) spent a lot of time on, placing photos near relevant others in various sets.

    I do like the larger default format. But that’s all.

  5. Absolutely stunning photo – the last highlights of dusk really add depth to the otherwise flat desert. And the rocket draws one into the picture.

    Regarding the sets – I’m not quite sure if I see what you mean. I still get sets on the right of this page, but now instead of just having the previous and next image, I can also scroll through the entire set, stream or group. It would be great though if there was some way to make all the icon scrollers appear open by default instead of just one.

  6. Nice!

    Not certain I like the new flickr format. With time you can usually get used to anything. That does not mean that it is necessarily better. Among other things, I’m not sure I need to know that the photo I am viewing also "appears in my contact list".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *