Canon PowerShot G9
ƒ/2.8
7.4 mm
1/3
200

Watching a demo at Microsoft today.

The features demonstrated were similar to Apple’s OS of four years prior (from rapid wakeup, to the dock (task bar), to screen and widget management, to the use of translucency on frames), but somehow that made me feel comfortable, like a leitmotif in the diffusion of design. Imagine how shocking it would be to see something new, even an artistic departure.

The one visual feature that looked like it departed from the OS X look-and-feel was tiled windows (filling the screen instead of overlapping), a feature that came and went in Windows 1.0 and now it’s back.

Then we saw a premier of the Windows 7 TV ad spot. It shows a young girl using a PC to make an animation of how easy Windows 7 is to use… and she ends with a zinger of an Apple-ad allusion: “I’m a PC, and this is getting good.”

I did get a copy of Windows 7 to play with; will need to find a PC at work.

The most interesting demo and discussion for me was around Bing. Imagine that. Badda Bing, badda boom! It is like a coral reef of specialized post-processing and data integration in the canonical verticals. Barney Pell called it “the professionalization of search, like with data mining and databases before, from one-size-fits-all, to specialization around common tasks.”

Ballmer was full of vigor and pithy quips, as usual (I had a prior conversation with the Microsoft team on what is on and off the record, and in striking that balance, I left out the gratuitously funny comments, as they may be a bit embarrassing out of context… but they sure made the day fun):

“In Search, we are like The Little Engine that Could. Anyone with single digit market share has to take that perspective.

We are absolutely committed to get to scale in the search business.

The next 5 years of search will bring more innovation than the past five years. Especially in the user interface. Think of how dull a search page is. Visualization and Natural Language processing are the two big future areas.

In retail today, there is Best Buy and Apple. And that makes Best Buy more pro-Apple than they otherwise might be. On Oct 22, we will open a couple stores.

In phones, PCs and TVs, I don’t think the hardware and software will come from one vendor. There’s a natural layering. In low volume products, like music players or game boxes, they can be integrated. But for high volume products, one vendor can’t do it all.

It’s very unlikely that we would do a phone. The BIOS has not yet been defined. The abstraction between hardware and software is not done yet.”

Muglia showed a snazzy demo of Excel 2010 linked to SQL Server with 100 million lines of data. He claims it is a main memory database, and what we saw were sorts and simple queries with sub-second responses on a “normal $1000 PC”

He also opines:
“Vista was a tough time for us. We are really, really glad to have Windows 7.”

7 responses to “Ballmer Ponders Windows 7”

  1. As a Vista user (among other systems) the biggest problem I had to overcome was backward compatibility with many apps, s/w and h/w. I seem to be beyond that (mostly) but it has been annoying. On the plus side, Vista seems to be much more stable than XP – I’ve yet to crash it, try as I might. So, my question about Win7 is … backward compatibility?

    As for Excel 2010, I think most MS Office users cursed the night over changes in the user i/f from 2003 to 2007, many of which didn’t/don’t seem to have any rhyme or reason. I hope 2010 doesn’t bring the same confusion. We’re just now getting Office 2007 rippled through the workplace. I love new s/w….

  2. Unlike many -so many- people that enjoy "punching the dummy" (ranting at MS), I have to say that my current two computers run vista and as long as the RAM was enough, otherwise the system always run flawlessly in my experience. Never rebooted, never hanged, never BSODs, and always fast and responsive. I’m not behind or for a technical debate, I just talk about my user experience. True, tho, I disabled Aero desktop feature (which allows fancy trasnparency that I think was not well designed technically for it eats up lots of memory), default search indexing and a couple of things which slow down the performance quite much and were *feats* of Vista over XP.

    Talking browsers, IE 7 likes to crash from time to time, but I have IE8 in the other machine and works alright. And from a designer point of view, they both have made it a lot easier for me to build cross-platform compatible websites.

    I look forward to see W7. They say Vista was to W7 what Millenium and W2000 was to XP.

    About his predictions and projections on search, I made my comments in the previous thread on Wowd. Hope he’s right, but I am not so optimistic research advancements required for the reality he envisions that soon ahead.

    PD: I didn’t know there existed the word "opine" in english… if it weren’t you speaking I would’ve thought it was spanglish ("opina" in spanish) 😉

  3. Vista was a tough time for us too, Ballmer.

  4. I wish the Google search had a personalized blacklist capability so people could filter out the websites gaming the system. When searching for a datasheet for a part, I often have to wade through several pages of websites either selling them (they’re always free from the manufacturer) or trying to get a commission referring you to excess stock vendors.

    If this MS search would allow blacklisting, perhaps it will be usable. Other than that, it sounds like a glitzy Vista-like interface when the current front runner is the one with a single text entry box. I suppose speech recognition will be the next step. I just hope it doesn’t turn into a consumer data-mining device.

  5. There is virtue in (belatedly) bringing Apple-like flavors to the masses, for which MSFT can be indeed commended. One has to figure now how to live with the hw/sw-incompatibility trade-offs. The OEMs themselves can only be happier in the process. I, for one, see no reason to move anytime soon from XP, yet data-level incompatibility can be a driver.

    I don’t get the BING part of the story. Each time I give BING the benefit of the doubt, I find myself back to Google in less than 20 seconds. What’s Ballmer’s bet, that search is this decade version of the browser? I don’t think so, hence I’d advise MSFT to look for viable alternative strategy. Taking search inside one’s computer (as opposed/complement to the internet) can indeed yield some results, but I have not heard anything specific about this. As for the internet side of search, a MSFT shareholder, myself included, could only wish MSFT spent its excess cash on building a search ecosystem instead of rewarding its executive. The only way things can be different in the foreseeable future is for MSFT to learn how to work with regulators at containing Google’s impressive search ecosystem.

    P.S. "Snazzy," such a MSFT keyword, adds to the authenticity of your recollection 😉

  6. as a former beta&gold user of Vista(technet); I was dismayed by how long it took MS to acknowledge it’s issues & promo a new solution.

    I went Mac because of it, & I was not a proponent of Mac’s. I ran Vista for 2+ years, on multiple machines, & even when you turned off the UAC & the GUI junk, it was still total pain. I only BSOD’d 1x but it crashed or became static for several minutes while doing menial tasks(I had a dual core 2.6 w/ 4gb ram & SSD drive)

    Personally I would’ve preferred linux, but Adobe Photoshop/Lightroom only supported Win or Mac. I do wonder how MS will do with the promotion of Win7, it will be more than an uphill battle….more like climbing Everest. The benefit to their sake is that the HW & OS is still cheaper than a basic Mac.

    Although showing the performance out of a million line spreadsheet; it seems rather ridiculous as a smart programmer would have have code to produce the result from a DB vs having to scroll through. Going from Ofc2003 to Ofc2007 is also baffling to me(I tried OfcXP as well); the UI is totally different; I can never find basic commands I used to use often(e.g., sum)

    Bing…where’d they come up with that name? Why not keep Live & just relaunch? Google has become a noun/adjective; not unlike Altavista of years before. Bing just doesn’t roll off the tongue as well. Bing will do better to sell itself in China or some other nation to gain market growth/improve itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *