Canon EOS 5D Mark II
ƒ/8
35 mm
1/2,000
640

The “Glory” (or Buddha’s light 佛光) is produced by the backscattering of sunlight off uniformly-sized water droplets. The angular size of the ring is much smaller than a rainbow, and varies with the size of the droplets.

Since childhood, I imagined that a rainbow would be a complete circle if the Earth’s horizon did not get in the way. I first saw a double rainbow circle example by helicopter, but could not capture it all in frame.

The zeppelin’s shadow reminds us that the sun has to be directly behind the observer for the double-bounce within each watery sphere to align across the spectrum.

10 responses to “Glorious Zeppelin”

  1. Beautiful shot! What a perfect moment to be there to capture this picture. Thanks for sharing it.

  2. Steve, the image and editorial are wonderful. The amazing thing is the double rainbow looks like a bullseye you have hit on target.

    Speaking of timing, here’s an image you might enjoy: arc de triomphe

  3. The rainbow is indeed a bulls-eye in the sense that its position relative to the shadow of the zeppelin can be used to extrapolate the observer’s location on the aircraft.

    On an unrelated note… I just watched five or six TED talks as I ate lunch and saw you in the audience of at least two of them. Nice! 🙂

    edit: And another one just now! (7:25)

  4. Glad you captured it this time! The zeps shadow is fitting, I think!

  5. nice one!
    the thumbnail looked like a torpedo in the water 😛

  6. awesome.. i love such pictures n phenomena.. 🙂 well captured!!!
    thanks

  7. I’ve seen this effect three times, all while flying in commercial jets. Thanks for capturing it so I can prove to my friends that I’m not crazy! 🙂

  8. P.S. I was pleased to see my airplane image used to illustrate the glory phenomena in the January 2012 issue of Scientific American:

    "The light energy beamed back by a glory originates mostly from wave tunneling, which is when light rays that missed a droplet can still transfer energy into it."

    Otherwise, the angle of refraction would be off by 14° from a perfect 180° reflection back to the observer. The author has been trying to explain the glory phenomenon since 1965!

Leave a Reply to msamaclean © Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *