
I just finished my bedtime reading, an essential survival guide on robots, with sections on How to Treat a Laser Wound, and How to Spot a Rebellious Robot Servant.
Author Daniel Wilson got his Ph.D. from CMU in robotics and worked in research labs at Microsoft, Intel and PARC.
Particularly helpful is his primer on How to Spot a Hostile Robot:
“Robots are notoriously difficult to predict because they generally lack facial expressions and body language. Without such subtle cues, you should ask yourself a few general questions:
• What is the robot designed for?
• What is around the robot?
• Has the robot been tampered with or modified?
• Is the robot moving or advancing?
• Does the robot have glowing red eyes?
• Does the robot have clenched fists, spinning buzz saws, or clamping pincers?
TRUST YOUR INSTINCTS
Steer clear if your gut tells you that something is not right.”
HUAR is one grass roots response. They are particularly disturbed by “scientists building robots specifically made to breathe fire“
Which all reminds me of my blog question: Can we transcend human intelligence with an evolutionary algorithm yet maintain an element of control, or even a bias toward friendliness?
Alas, Wilson dodges the question of self-replicating nanobots altogether. They could eat the Earth in 2.78 hours. =)




Leave a Reply