Canon PowerShot SD700 IS
ƒ/5.5
23.2 mm
1/1

Gordon Moore was in a merry mood last night at a charity dinner. We swapped childhood stories about rockets and explosives. He used to mix his own nitroglycerin and dynamite.

We also spoke about the myriad industries that have been disrupted by the steady march of Moore’s Law, from Tesla cars to synthetic genomics.

The non-linear exponentiation of technological capabilities is a fundamental and perpetual source of disruption that creates opportunities for entrepreneurship and new products. Apple could predict exactly when the price of hard drives and then flash memory would enable the iPod to disrupt the Sony Walkman business.

Moore’s Law drives electronics, communications and computers and has become a primary driver in drug discovery and bioinformatics, medical imaging and diagnostics.

More than a niche subject of interest only to chip designers, the continued march of Moore’s Law will affect all of the sciences, as they migrate from lab to simulation. Accurate simulation demands computational power, and once a sufficient threshold has been crossed, simulation acts as an innovation accelerant over physical experimentation. Many more questions can be answered per day.

NASA Ames recently shut down their wind tunnels. As Moore’s Law provided enough computational power to model turbulence and airflow, there was no longer a need to test iterative physical design variations of aircraft in the wind tunnels, and the pace of innovative design exploration dramatically accelerated.

Recent accuracy thresholds have been crossed in diverse areas, such as modeling the weather (predicting a thunderstorm six hours in advance) and automobile collisions (a relief for the crash test dummies), and the thresholds have yet to be crossed for many areas, such as protein folding dynamics.

(More Moore)
.

5 responses to “Ever Moore”

  1. One great man…with one awesome boa =)

  2. I´ve been reading time ago an accurate research done to find out the true story of Murphy´s Law (this is a good excerpt and may interest you for it is on engineering and G-force tests-… and it comes to show that, as with Gordon´s Law– he never said the "Law" as it was quoted later ("if something can go wrong, it will."), neither Murphy stated the original sentence as anything as important as to be given the status of Law! Someone else, John Paul Stapp, took the already changed words and quoted them as a Law in a press conference.

    Well, nothing… just thought of sharing the connection I´d made… =)

    ps:_ oh, and, nice boa, gordon… 😀

  3. I wonder if Mr. Moore ever tires of talking about his "law". If I were him, I would pimpslap the next person who asked me about it. (Not you of course, Steve, but maybe a journalist from from USA Today).

    Simulation accuracy obviously depends on the accuracy of the models. It’s probably expensive to run a windtunnel so there’s a financial incentive to get rid of it, but I do wonder if a computer-based simulator can capture all facets of fluid dynamics (or all relevant ones). I do know there are chaotic waveflows — does this all appear in the simulation?

    I’m a chip designer, and I’d say for sure that simulation of 65nm circuits are only an approximation to what actually comes back from the fab. That’s what the lab and split lots are for.

  4. With the use of energy landscape theory the protein folding dynamics should be more then just a hypothesys, interesting what he said about that?

  5. Thank you for giving your knowledge. You are a mench.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *