Canon EOS 5D
ƒ/7.1
170 mm
1/5,000
800

The flame is 18.5 long. On other photos, nine discrete Mach diamonds can be seen in the plume.

The sound was incredible, deep, and loud… louder than any rocket I have heard. I was hanging out at the far pads and was quite close to this one (this was only a 170mm zoom vs. 400mm for most of the other BALLS shots)

(Previous)(Next)

28 responses to “Blastoff!”

  1. Ohmyyes. That’s sweet! Mach 9 is insane! Gorgeous thing and great shot as always!

  2. Love it! Sight to behold!

  3. yes: SLINGSHOT THAT THING OUT OF HERE!!

  4. What a shot…fantastic

  5. Whoa, don’t think I’ve ever seen anything like that before, certainly not on Flickr. Great shot.

    (1-2-3)

  6. A wild shot to say the least – very cool (123)

  7. Spectacular capture! Very interesting and well shot.

    Discovered in 1-2-3

  8. WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Seen in 1-2-3 (?)

  9. ahhhhh…………….

  10. W O W… what a shot, and what a moment!

  11. great shot –

    you photos are CRAZY!!!


    Seen on your photo stream. (?)

  12. Wonderful shot! =) Just perfectly framed too! =)

  13. What a perfect shot. Great moment!

  14. Awesome shot… one of the best I’ve seen!

    A note to the poster, however: The term "Mach Diamond" having anything to do with the speed of a motor’s exit gases is actually a misnomer. 😮

    Mach diamonds, as great as they look, are telling you that you have not expanded the combustion products at the nozzle exit to the exact surrounding ambient pressure. Theoretically (but usually not really so) if the conditions were absolutely correct you would have no mach diamonds.

    Imagine the exhaust as a hollow column – the walls of the column are reflective to pressure waves. As these waves cross back and forth they create the zones of differing densities and termperature we call mach diamonds. The pressure waves come from the gas in the column trying to match the surrounding pressure.

    So you really cannot tell much by counting mach diamonds…certainly not thrust or exhaust velocity.

    The general volume of the plume is relatable to thrust when compared to exactly the same propellant operating at the same pressure at the same ambient pressure, but with a different nozzle and thrust level.

    Just FYI. 😉

  15. fascinating…. so many people have relayed this "rule of thumb" to me

  16. Awesome site, makes me wish I got to observe this in person. Thanks for sharing!


    Seen in A+++ Photo (Post 1 give A+++ logo to 3 pics)-1/day-Read Rules (?)


    A+++ Grade Photo
    Commented with SIC

  17. Love this shot! Please Share your best pictures of the world with us.

    What
    a Wonderful World
    Group
    please add tag WONDERWORLD
    Contests – Mountains and the Rugged Country Perfect Capture. Best sunrise and sunset, Spectacular Landscapes and September Photo of the Month *Open NOW*

    No doubt this is a Worlds Best Dazzling shot! We’d love to include it in our
    collection! So here’s your official invitation!

    World’s Best Dazzling Shots please add tag "WORLDBEST"
    Contests – Perfect High Speed Photo, Excellent Autumn Capture, Spectacular Landscapes, *OPEN NOW*
    It’s all about water, Brilliant Animal’s Shot, Amazing Sunrise/Sunset and Amazing Macro *Vote NOW*<

  18. WIRED issue 16.11 has a cool story and diagram of this rocket.
    .

  19. Just happened on this photo — yea the "rule of thumb" ain’t exactly right 🙂 Check out the isentropic flow relations (as posted previously), particularly the one for A/A* — that gives expansion ratio as a function of exit Mach number and gamma value for the exhaust. Typical solid propellant exhaust has a gamma of ~1.2, so plug that into the relation with M = 9 and you’ll get A/A* = 12,383, meaning the exit cone would have to expand to 12,383 times the throat area to get that flow velocity. If that weren’t enough, the pressure at that point (given by the P/Pt equation) would be 1.76e-6 that of the chamber pressure; that’s impossible to have in a rocket operating in the atmosphere, due to flow separation in the nozzle. (At that pressure ratio, for the flow not to separate, the chamber pressure would have to be ~3 million psi!)

    Neat pic, though. I heard Gene scrubbed this year — too bad. Balls should still be great though, as always; see you on the playa!

  20. What motor is that? . . .btw this is an amazing shot!

  21. Magnificent capture of this lovely rocket launching!

Leave a Reply to Shandchem Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *