PENTAX Optio WP
ƒ/6.6
6.3 mm
1/640
50

This colorless synthetic diamond from Apollo Diamond may pose a bit of a challenge to the African warlords and the De Beers cartel.

This diamond has the same atomic structure as a mined diamond, and is therefore optically, chemically and physically identical. But Apollo plans to get the cost down to $10/carat with high volume manufacturing.

It is grown one carbon atom at a time in a customized CVD (chemical vapor deposition) process. A perfect seed crystal starts the process (over time, Apollo has enlarged the “seed” to wafer scale). The seed is placed in a microwave chamber with a hydrogen + methane plasma heated to 1300 degrees that rains reactive carbon down onto the seed, growing ~1 carat per 12 hours.

Although the manufacturing process should produce diamonds with fewer flaws than mined diamonds, this early diamond has some defects that I could only see with the macro lens (inclusions and a crown notch. I’m just happy to have a version with personality. =)

It is 8mm wide by 2mm deep. Right now the 2mm depth is the critical manufacturing limit, and it affects the ability to do a standard brilliant diamond cut. So this one is flat and wide. But they can make sheets of diamond with this thickness. Imagine a diamond window pane, or semiconductor wafers that can run at 81 Ghz without elaborate cooling.

48 responses to “Diamond Age”

  1. Really interesting…making diamonds with CVD. I’ll try to make my girlfriend (who works at a high end Newbury St. jewelry firm) next time I’m in the lab.

  2. As you suggest, great development for Africa –cheap, plentiful coltan next? Here’s hoping, and gracias!!

  3. Great photo and fascinating explanation! Should have some interesting manufacturing applications, too, considering how diamonds are used as cutting tools. (Macro 1-2-3)

  4. I’ve often wondered what a sheet of diamond would look like. Would the high index of refraction be noticeable? It’ll be exciting to find out.

  5. I can see many flaws in the picture, but I am also sure that the rock mounted in a ring will look magnificent.

  6. I read about Apollo awhile ago and I’m glad to see their progress. I’m all for lab grown diamonds. DeBeers is long overdue for a kick in the a$$. Now I can finally get that tiara I’ve been dreaming about. 😉

  7. The range of industrial uses for these synthetic diamonds is thought provoking. Very interesting.

  8. G’wan then, how much is it worth? 😉

  9. That’s vera cool. I mean, actual decent quality diamonds created in 12 hours! Seems like the low end market could crash…

    I wonder how hard it would be to shatter a 4’x5′ window of diamond. Hard stuff, but very brittle. Be a shame to have something that you bump into and *FOOOOMP* diamond flying everywhere like tempered glass. I guess tempered glass is special, though, in that it’s totally under stress and once you let it out, game over.

  10. Now we’re talking my language Steve! hahaha How are you? Hope things are good.

    Cheers 🙂

  11. A flawless solitaire with its many facets is a treasure regardless of how it came to be don’t you think?

  12. I like the idea of a diamond window. Since a diamond is carbon, is it electrically conductive? I would think it would be. So would diamonds replace copper on a semiconductor wafer?

  13. A treasure, sure, but if it’s easy to make, the supply increases should make the prices go down and we’ll get big diamonds used places where we never thought feasable.

  14. BDBA! (Beware De Beers Assassins!)

  15. rocketeer: pure diamond is an insulator, but can become a semiconductor when doped with Boron. You may be thinking of carbon nanotubes, which can be metallic conductors (or semiconductors based on their chirality). In theory, metallic nanotubes can have a current density 1000x greater than copper.

    Carbon is a wonderfully versatile element.

  16. What about heat/IR conductance of diamonds? Having a tough high heat conductance window would be quite interesting.

  17. I’m dazzled, and if it sparkles, I’m there. 🙂
    This is a gorgeous shot, and I realize that perusing each of your pictures is a learning experience. For that matter, you perusing MY pictures is a learning experience–animals and nasal memory, for example. 🙂 I have thoroughly enjoyed each "lesson," and I’m looking forward to more!

  18. I wish artificial diamonds would take off. The problem is that people aren’t just buying the physical material, but the history (hype). De Beers marketing will convince people that not only do you want a diamond, you want an *old* diamond, which will keep their prices high. There’s not much of a market for secondhand diamonds, so they can control the suppliers. If people bought diamonds on ebay, the artificial ones would mix in with the natural ones and prices would come down, but because people almost always buy them from jewelry stores, the artificial ones aren’t going to mix into the natural diamond supply.

    So although a few people will buy these diamonds (just as a few people buy Priuses), I’m not optimistic that it will bring down De Beers diamond prices.

  19. I agree with you, Amitp. DeBeers has a great racket. If you look back in history, engagement rings were normally sapphires, not diamonds. DeBeers was one of the first to pay to get their product into films-as early as silent films. Yeah, it’s hype…diamonds can break..they do not hold their value at all. I contacted Apollo and they told me they’re close to having the 1 carat diamonds ready to sell. right now they’re selling their inventory of smaller stones just from a historical perspective, as they are the diamonds that were part of the dev. process. Some have color…all are graded. Anyway..contact them if you want more info.

  20. Great picture and text.

    Hmmm. With a 2mm depth, a 3.3 mm average girdle diameter would be about right for a decently proportioned round brilliant cut stone. But that’s only .13 ct. That’s no fun!

  21. This is closer to a cm wide. It’s totally the wrong cut, but a much higher ct wt., for now… (and there are some cool tricks one can play with an e-beam machine to create diffraction gratings on the back-side… to play with the ideal angle and color)

  22. Thanks for licensing this CC-BY! Your choice of a free license has allowed us to use your image in Wikimedia Commons. You can view it at commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Apollo_synthetic_diamond…

  23. Thanks for the education, nice photo of all the faces of the diamond.

    1-2-3


    Seen in 1-2-3 (?)

  24. I’m impressed that they did that well (and fast) with CVD.

    The first thing I was thinking was not "window," but lens. There are a lot of spectroscopic uses I could think of for a cheap diamond element. Or, more mundane, like a cell phone lens…

    Then you mentioned the *beautiful* idea of ebeam milling it. Since its cheap, why not! One could make some really cool diffraction elements, etc that way.

  25. This photograph appears in a NowPublic news story: De Beers and the Kimberly Process.

  26. beautiful diamond
    nice shot

  27. You are invited to add this photo to the Simply Diamonds group:

    Simply Diamonds

    Simply Diamonds

  28. try same shot w/ flash. cool effect. find example on my profile under mechanical stills set.

    josh.

  29. Hi. I wanted to let you know that I’m using this photo, in accordance with the Creative Commons License, on my blog: weeklymobilegoodies.blogspot.com

  30. Hi I’m Korean publishing editor.
    I’want to get your photos for a book(the title is "color". it’s science book about the color,light,culture,chemistry and so on…) so I want to ask the royalty for that.
    Please give me e-mail(henamu@yahoo.co.kr)

  31. Sure… All of my photos are free to use with a simple photo attribution. thanks.

  32. I appreciate your pemission.
    Thank you very much.
    Best wishes to you!

  33. shiny! I like very much your macro set. Those photos are really incredible

  34. Thank you for the gorgeous photo and the CC licence: we used it on a blog post today:
    http://www.tamebay.com/2008/06/just-two-sellers-qualify-as-diamo...

  35. This is just what I needed. Thank you for sharing! I used it here: http://www.suite101.com/content/synthetic-diamonds-man-made-diam...

  36. I guess diamonds aren’t going to be as rare as they say. Even though now they are only as rare as the women who adorn them, which is a ton.
    edwardsvillemls.com

  37. I understand that diamonds burn. If this technique progressed like Moore’s Law, I wonder how soon before I can buy a bag of diamond briquettes for a weekend barbecue?

    (with a beer in my hand and De Beers on the grill)

  38. Natural diamonds will keep up with the price. And fakers will cease to exist, like this Appolo company did.

  39. WOW – learn something new every day 🙂 Thanks for the info – cool shot!

  40. Great photo, and thanks for releasing it under Creative Commons! I used it in this article.

  41. Amazing how far synthetic diamonds have come in the past few decades. Thanks! I used this picture here: Diamond Selling Tips to Help You Succeed

  42. I am not sure how to link; can you help me?

Leave a Reply to kodefuguru Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *