Nokia Progression

10 responses to “Nokia Progression”

1. 

   BenODen

   Mar 28, 2005 at 5:51 pm

   Cool illustration. I can’t see for sure, but I’d hazzard a guess that the boards are getting progressively thinner?

   Reply
2. 

   complexify.

   Mar 28, 2005 at 7:11 pm

   This photo makes me wish I had saved my very first cell phone, an analog Nokia 121 (their second model, I believe, after the 101):

   

   It’d be an interesting fourth row for this pic, as it was thick enough to fit more than two sides of components on the board. 😉

   Reply
3. 

   zany destruction

   Mar 28, 2005 at 8:54 pm

   I have a 3360. I think Nokia has had the lead for some time in user friendly cellphones. The menu structure was so well deisgned from the begining, it also makes you comfortable with every new phone you get.
   New phones have new features, but they’re all fitted nicely into the existent concept. And the Nokia tdma phones I’ve used are the best in switching from system to system in long distance travelling. Although it’s old tecnollogy now, but gsm here in Argentina suffers the problems every new technology does: they sell the phones first, then make the real investments in antenna infrastructure (if they get to sell enough phones!). If you do travel a lot, gsm phones suck!

   Reply
4. 

   finicky whistle

   Mar 28, 2005 at 10:13 pm

   hahaaaa
   more disassembled stuff
   :p

   Reply
5. 

   SSS8

   Mar 29, 2005 at 5:46 am

   Beautiful! A whole hierarchy of angels. Its like art work. (I can say that; I studied Architecture). I still have my first Nokia flip (1999). Its awesomely gigantic. Too attached to allow an autopsy. (BTW after much research, ordered Sync and buying myself Godel for my bday Fri.)

   Reply
6. 

   goofy comparison

   Mar 29, 2005 at 3:13 pm

   Keep up the good work. Thanks.

   Reply
7. 

   dcJohn

   Mar 30, 2005 at 10:00 pm

   very cool; I like being able to trace the layers of the engineering through image. I actually ran across this in the macro gallery, and thougth I’d mention that while it’s very cool, it’s not a macro photograph.

   Reply
8. 

   jurvetson

   Mar 30, 2005 at 10:46 pm

   dcJ; good point. I’ll remove it. Here’s an extreme macro shot to restore the balance. =)

   Reply
9. 

   valuable silk

   Apr 5, 2005 at 6:57 am

   mmm, crackers and tarts

   Reply
10. 

    ambitious hall

    Jul 17, 2009 at 10:04 am

    Hi, I’m an admin for a group called Naked, Undressed, Exposed Electronics, and we’d love to have this added to the group!

    Excellent picture.

    Reply